Mailing list search service

1. minutes: TAG 18 Oct 2004 for review (score: 41) (40,459 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:06:05 -0500 List: Public/www-tag

--=-ul3yZlUjDXN8J6Wngg/0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable TAG Weekly Teleconference 18 Oct 2004 Present: Norm, TimBL, Chris, Stuart, Noah (parts), DanC, Roy, PaulC

2. [Fwd: Re: KD007 Assertion that two URIs identify the same resource] (score: 41) (8,224 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:30:19 -0500 List: Public/www-archive

--=-he+5iAtyEHCBjyqPz96c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was going to tell Karl "it already does say this" but the relevant text is in the future

3. Re: A present for Guy Fawkes night (score: 41) (4,701 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 08:28:09 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <8D5B24B83C6A2E4B9E7EE5FA82627DC94D3082@sdcexcea01.emea.cpqcorp.net> References: 1

--=-skF2K4EE0AbEovkacpsZ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nifty... Ah... RDF descriptions of the result set, not the matching subset? Oh... Is that how to get the

4. agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (in progress) (score: 41) (229,369 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:22:44 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2004-12-07T14:30Z tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:

5. scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) (score: 41) (1,167 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:49:09 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

I need a volunteer, please. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

6. Re: scribe for tomorrow? (7 Dec) (score: 41) (1,847 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 10:54:38 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041206164929.GB20771@monkeyfist.com> References: 1 2

Sorta... I was working on using RDF to build the agenda, and I only got part way done, but I had a doctor's appointment, so I sent what I had. But then I was too late for the appointment and had to r

7. test case approval reflected in manifest? (score: 41) (1,663 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:18:34 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

Steve, Eric, and everybody, I see we approved 4 tests last week. (yay!) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0394.html I don't see an action to update the test repository to

8. agenda: RDF Data Access WG 7 Dec (score: 41) (4,224 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 12:43:16 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <1102350164.5431.15.camel@dirk> References: 1

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2004-12-07T14:30Z tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:

9. Re: alternative result format using collections - avoid use/mention issues (score: 41) (4,813 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:55:47 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <OFF29BC6B2.BA3C3951-ONC1256F62.006FC101-C1256F62.007F69FA@agfa.com> References: 1

That has the same use/mention issues; i.e. it relates ?mbox to a mailbox, while the spec says query results bind variables to terms. I think maybe it's OK, but in contrast... The recent cwm reificati

10. Re: Regrets for dawg 2004-12-07 telcon (score: 41) (1,641 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:20:14 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041207132542.702ef4bb@hedwig.dajobe.org> References: 1

any news on your actions? ACTION DaveB: update the dawg test repository to record or amend tests to correspond to the http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0241.html -- Dan C

11. [Fwd: Clothing for Finland] (score: 41) (4,672 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 08:37:07 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

as mentioned in telcon... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E Return-Path: <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com> X-Original-To: connolly@homer.w3

12. Re: apologies and regrets (and SPARQL definitions) (score: 41) (5,127 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:14:20 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <p06001f07bdda9b2eedbb@[10.100.0.9]> References: 1

It's very polite of you to apologize so profusely, but I don't really see any reason to apologize, so I don't accept. You've clearly put a lot of time into reviewing the SPARQL definitions and the co

13. Re: SPARQL: SOURCE is suboptimal (score: 41) (1,586 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:44:16 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments
In-Reply-To: <21AA7C98-3CAA-11D9-B85E-000A9580D8C0@w3.org> References: 1

Thanks for your comment; the WG is exploring the SOURCE design space (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#SOURCE) and we've incorporated your comment into the discussion. It may be some weeks

14. Re: Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (score: 41) (2,939 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:54:24 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <41AF5874.9020507@hp.com> References: 1 2

Compelling... that suggests you'll be updating the SPARQL spec to use N3-like syntax for triple patterns. Note the WG made a decision 30 Nov to adopt test cases that do _not_ use an N3-like syntax to

15. Re: SPARQL: SOURCE is suboptimal (score: 41) (1,604 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:56:38 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments
In-Reply-To: <21AA7C98-3CAA-11D9-B85E-000A9580D8C0@w3.org> References: 1

Thanks for your comment; the WG is exploring the SOURCE design space (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#SOURCE) and we've incorporated your comment into the discussion. It may be some weeks

16. optional clauses: vivid test case (score: 41) (1,434 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:58:37 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

Bob M. sent us a "use case" in the form of an example from a tool he works with. It's pretty close to sparql syntax. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Dec/0000.html Can

17. Re: Use case for optional clauses (score: 41) (1,390 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:59:37 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments
In-Reply-To: <41AF46D7.7010607@siderean.com> References: 1

Thanks for the detailed input. I'm working on integrating it into our test suite. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

18. Re: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset (score: 41) (1,404 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:02:13 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments
In-Reply-To: <5D8A37C6-4246-11D9-B85E-000A9580D8C0@w3.org> References: 1

Thanks for the feedback on the SPARQL design. The WG is discussing it as we work toward our next draft. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE

19. Re: The XML Schema GRDDL Story (score: 41) (5,520 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 17:41:33 -0600 List: Public/www-archive
In-Reply-To: <1102460764.5431.204.camel@dirk> References: 1 2

[+cc www-archive; I presume nobody minds.] OK, one XSLT deely to extract the embedded RDF from the schema that expresses the "namespaceTransformation" relationship: http://www.w3.org/2003/g/embeddedR

20. Re: sparql protocol simplex updated (protocolRootReferent issue) (score: 41) (3,191 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:10:04 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <41B867A0.40206@hp.com> References: 1 2

This part of your message seems relevant to an existing issue http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#protocolRootReferent That's a good thing, per my experience. (as reported earlier in a DESCRI

21. Re: Scheduled CWM/Notation3 Meeting: 2004-12-13 18:30 UTC (score: 41) (1,878 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:47:36 -0600 List: Public/public-cwm-talk
In-Reply-To: <4199B7FB.20402@infomesh.net> References: 1

something's come up. I might not be able to make it. bummer. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

22. what does SPARQL stand for? (issues#languageProtocolName) (score: 41) (1,905 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:04:50 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

I'm looking for issues we can close easily, and the name thing seems pretty well settled: I'm getting pretty much uniformly positive feedback on SPARQL. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#la

23. dependency on XQuery (score: 41) (2,268 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:36:37 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

I just re-read.. "DaveB noted that a normative dependency on XQuery would be incompatible with the current DAWG schedule." -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs and that reminded me... we

24. Re: SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format draft - for review (score: 41) (2,232 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:49:37 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041213143441.3016b27c.dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk> References: 1

Is the RELAX NG schema really a complete definition of the syntax? Does it capture, for example, the connection between the names inside <variables> and the names inside <result>? Test case: <dawg-re

25. agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Dec (score: 41) (4,184 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:30:35 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 2004-12-14T14:30Z tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 supplementary IRC chat:irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear:

26. test case: colons in paths? (score: 41) (1,287 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:35:56 -0600 List: Public/uri

What happens if you put a colon in a path, esp in refTo()? sorry to be cryptic; hope to fill in details later. This came from... http://www.w3.org/2004/12/13-tagmem-irc#T20-34-57 -- Dan Connolly, W3C

27. Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 14 Dec (minutes) (score: 41) (1,761 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:46:04 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <1102955435.5431.464.camel@dirk> References: 1

Tom, I hope nothing terrible has happened to you. The meeting participants scribbled some stuff in IRC and agreed to let that stand as a record of today's teleconference. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://

28. do-over on test approval (score: 41) (2,733 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:13:39 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

Today I re-opened our decision to approve http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2-4a as it was evidently not clear to many WG members that this involved approving the synta

29. SOURCE test case sketches from users, please? (score: 41) (2,431 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:27:56 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

I once again pleaded that we postpone SOURCE 'till next time, and then took a straw poll which resulted in many "my users want source" responses. I'm still concerned that we won't find a SOURCE desig

30. Re: tests and inference? (score: 41) (1,958 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:31:05 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <D24D16A6707B0A4B9EF084299CE99B3912CB44F3@mcl-its-exs02.mail.saic.com> References: 1

Did you mean to send this to public-rdf-dawg@w3.org? You sent it to the -request address. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

31. Re: The XML Schema GRDDL Story (score: 41) (2,376 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:33:09 -0600 List: Public/www-archive
In-Reply-To: <AF156BFC-4DFD-11D9-8ECC-000A9582FD3A@w3.org> References: 1 2 3 4 5

[...] oops... wherein we see "See also the GRDDL HowTo." --> GRDDL Data Views: Getting Started, Learning More http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly

32. Re: The XML Schema GRDDL Story (score: 41) (5,276 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:44:45 -0600 List: Public/www-archive
In-Reply-To: <1103139101.7922.186.camel@localhost> References: 1 2 3 4 5

well, that's the issue right there. GRDDL isn't inherently aware of XML Schema; it knows about XHTML, RDF, XML and namespaces, and it depends on some widely deployed programming language(s), for whic

33. Re: same-syntax extensions to RDF (score: 41) (2,091 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:07:38 -0600 List: Public/www-archive
In-Reply-To: <20041216050839.EAEEA4F0E8@homer.w3.org> References: 1 2 3

But you also mean to say that "any fine number of applications of these rules yeilds an element of the class Formula" and such, right? That's a case of "generalization to infinitely many cases". http

34. RE: tests and inference? (score: 41) (2,337 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:20:33 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <D24D16A6707B0A4B9EF084299CE99B391935852B@mcl-its-exs02.mail.saic.com> References: 1

Inference affects the input graph. Our tests state the input graph explicitly. Given the input graph, the results of the query are determined by the spec*. * or... at least: I hope so; the SOURCE des

35. Re: tests and inference? (score: 41) (3,655 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:02:13 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041216143359.GC26819@monkeyfist.com> References: 1 2 3

Hmm... yes, the test suite should be more explicit... let's see... the docs currently say "A query action requires two items: the query and the dataset." -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests

36. Re: tests and inference? (score: 41) (3,198 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:19:31 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041216150919.GA27225@monkeyfist.com> References: 1 2 3 4

That's a misuse of "must not", IMO. We don't write "the sum of 2 and 2 must be 4"; we just write "the sum of 2 and 2 is 4". Also, graphs aren't mutable. Please let's stick to "is not". cf must is for

37. Re: tests and inference? (score: 41) (2,828 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:54:01 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041216152825.GA27356@monkeyfist.com> References: 1 2 3 4

[...] Graphs, like integers, strings, sets, etc. aren't mutable; they don't have state. They don't change. To speak of modifying them is imprecise, at best. The set {a} is related to the set {a, b} b

38. Re: same-syntax extensions to RDF (score: 41) (4,951 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:08:34 -0600 List: Public/www-archive
In-Reply-To: <20041216154457.EDE784F0A2@homer.w3.org> References: 1 2 3 4

Roughly, maybe, but formal systems are all about precision. Nothing in a "forall" says that every formula is the result of *finitely many* applications of that axiom. That axiom is consistent with in

39. Re: Small items for SPARQL (score: 41) (3,812 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:59:43 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <41C31DE0.4020908@hp.com> References: 1

SPARQL queries are sequences of characters; how they're encoded is a protocol issue, right? i.e. under the "chair expects editor to respond to each proposal to change that editor's spec; others in th

40. Re: query parameter name clashes? (score: 41) (1,906 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:03:14 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041217180242.GA6125@monkeyfist.com> References: 1 2 3

[...] Right; we can't ignore it. But we can, after considering it, decide on a design that doesn't allow it. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91

41. Re: Scribe apology (score: 41) (1,687 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:54:42 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <C6FE6F4C-4F77-11D9-B3D0-000A95C9112A@tucanatech.com> References: 1

We would have liked to have you with us, but we managed. Good to see you surfacing... part of me wondered if something really bad had happened to you. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Co

42. Re: Small items for SPARQL (score: 41) (1,881 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:15:43 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <41C34DF4.3000903@hp.com> References: 1 2 3 4

yes, very well, but... Hmm... what files are discussed in rq23/? It makes sense to document the contents of the test files in the test suite description, and it makes sense to specify encodings in UR

43. math:sum crashes on strings (score: 41) (3,108 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:17:02 -0600 List: Public/public-cwm-bugs

$ echo '@prefix m: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/math#>. { (1 "abc") m:sum ?X } => { <> a <#PassingTest> }.' | python cwm.py --think Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/connolly/w3ccvs/W

44. Re: math:sum crashes on strings (score: 41) (1,545 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:28:04 -0600 List: Public/public-cwm-bugs
In-Reply-To: <OFD053F9FC.B365D549-ONC1256F6F.0000A129-C1256F6F.0001276C@agfa.com> References: 1

Did you update just today? I checked in a fix just after I filed the bug. But I haven't written a test, nor have I fixed the other math: routines. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connol

45. Re: UNSAID drafted and mapped to SQL (score: 41) (5,905 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 08:30:59 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <p06001f13bdeac31e04c9@[192.168.1.7]> References: 1 2

That's been my position too, but I don't think I agree with your justification. Do you mean "in some cases, RDF graphs are not complete" or "in all cases, RDF graphs are not complete"? The latter is

46. Re: tests and inference? (and UNSAID) (score: 41) (3,757 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 09:01:05 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041216151712.GD12501@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> References: 1 2 3 4

Well, no, I don't think so. In particular, it seems we had better discuss the following two tests: 1. input graph: query: SELECT ?C WHERE (:x rdf:type ?C). answer per current* editors draft: ?C binds

47. Re: Abstract protocol URIs (score: 41) (3,759 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:51:03 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041221090241.C1452@monkeyfist.com> References: 1 2

OK. I think what _has_ to change, per W3C publication rules[1] is - using uris of the form http://www.w3.org/YYYY/... (note to EricP: we can mint http://www.w3.org/YYYY/MM/foo names just by doing CVS

48. Re: UNSAID + inference tests (score: 41) (2,490 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:55:00 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <20041221184450.GO23271@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> References: 1 2

I was a little surprised too about UNSAID not binding variables too, though it makes sense when I think about it. It seems worthwhile to keep that test around too. Please make a test out of the ASK a

49. Re: F2F4 information (score: 41) (1,770 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:42:39 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg
In-Reply-To: <4188D465.3080806@profium.com> References: 1

Janne, The only pointer I can find is to... http://www.profium.com/contact/travel.html which has some relevant info, but not the address of the meeting room. I was looking for a page specific to this

50. DAWG ftf5 and W3C tech plenary registration (score: 41) (1,588 bytes)
Author: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:49:10 -0600 List: Public/public-rdf-dawg

Registration is open for the Tech plenary http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TP2005/ including our 5th ftf meeting, (28 Feb-1 Mar 2005). Unfortunately, it conflicts with the SemWeb IG ftf. Regarding