Public Comment is a vital part of our multistakeholder model. It provides a mechanism for stakeholders to have their opinions and recommendations formally and publicly documented. It is an opportunity for the ICANN community to effect change and improve policies and operations.
Submissions for this Proceeding
Pilot Holistic Review Revised Draft Terms of Reference
View this Proceeding
My Submissions
Search Public Comment Submissions For This Proceeding
To search for keywords within Public Comment submissions documents or pages, type in the keyword and press Enter after each selection.
Submission Summary:
Please find attached (PDF) the ALAC Statement on the Pilot Holistic Review Revised Draft Terms of Reference
Ratification information is included on the cover page.
Kind Regards,
ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
Website: atlarge.icann.org
Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge
Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge
Submission Summary:
The NCSG believes that the updated draft TOR still contains some level of ambiguity that requires better clarity.
Submission Summary:
The ISPCP considers that the new TOR for the Pilot Holistic Review are clearer and more concise than the previous one, but it is still lacking independent examination. Also 18 months to fulfill the PHR is too ambitious, considering the deliverables (12) and the amount of time required from community volunteers.
Submission Summary:
The Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the Pilot Holistic Review (PHR) Revised Draft Terms of Reference. The RySG also reiterates its support for the ATRT3 recommendation for instituting a new holistic review of ICANN, and the Board’s decision to initiate a Pilot Holistic Review as a test-bed for the scope and extent of such reviews.
Submission Summary:
The ccNSO Council expresses its support for the draft Revised Terms of Reference and the next steps as noted in the Background section of the public comment announcement on the Pilot Holistic Review Draft Terms of Reference.
Submission Summary:
As written, Section IV: Definitions and Acronyms is clear only for someone who is already familiar ICANN and its way of wording things. (Who probably has minimal need for it.) The comment suggests a couple of places where unpacking further would result in greater transparency.