[IPsec] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with COMMENT)
John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 07 December 2022 15:10 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4C3C14CE23; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 07:10:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, kivinen@iki.fi, kivinen@iki.fi
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.2.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <167042581988.31849.9516633138605417248@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 07:10:19 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/x306G4n0lbbuUo8KeY6HibRg3A0>
Subject: [IPsec] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 15:10:20 -0000
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nits - “A few notably” should be “A few notable” - “an addition Security Context selector” should be “an additional...” - s/standarized/standardized/
- [IPsec] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf… John Scudder via Datatracker
- Re: [IPsec] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-… Paul Wouters