Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with DISCUSS)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 16 December 2022 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9532C1516FA for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 07:34:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gjBGyXyE0ASI for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 07:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E39D2C1516F9 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 07:34:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id pe2so1063555qkn.1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 07:34:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7PMgmvoOPqgzdckaR2S8+AbYeGCfrLyIugRMsFxWDMg=; b=CbqvdqPzbS9xMsj2iMIvtKd3D6XR56fYS9Ch2uKAy3vwnpsaJgrlSd3CatXdinbfa5 PEaSFJltZi4hcigZsZtN6Sx23JzKqQPxaZ2Ij6l8MSsfqjCwq1W0yRzaZc9tYnhBO8OT 8dOe7VefLJt5xhZOLIYGs6H29/UiT3EZItTlDQ3EBZK+Je3vcyyqsVPM8rVkLZvIu2Gy Is/UZEr5je5JBLGoegoWOvLwx06qS3QeUsLxnH2QDG2dVg+M/ZDSKFB5k5QMP/UyPSh1 hUAt+JZIlJGwiIsGHKeUr566auYPT+vyHZbWolM6AS9OKy2/z5UAE40055Kd2KXCjkhj xB6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7PMgmvoOPqgzdckaR2S8+AbYeGCfrLyIugRMsFxWDMg=; b=1lR8cfiL2Cn7t92hO0dxVVuIoycCMml9TIzK+xT8l1biPOMXUUdl/lTDoX59BMU6cX 6Qbfx/3MmckrpfnNAEGIuXdeYaFwXR3ilvyHcKraW1q1FSMgVJhgBfH116rgWGK6HtH4 6SnWViiCj2Z0rttMcFv8FgVOeOv0N4RBi1Y4iPXwpHWWNXNHxJP/jgwiGBamCqxfIiKx lwzGGWX429Fa+WIdxc9bNqqEg+V8WmzGycHwInz89MxQJu4OuTc4AsJbcQg4JHo4+9qV nBHXgSSCAaT036G4S+aP9b+NExcEqqQJlzMNCtJjZV+ayWLQc/YmJl+lPM72D2z+Sl1R Zw0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmS2r57nqRI8QDzNoQEJYMrIr5Hx3bNnZcs7iysQNB4hOKgC0vQ gLPV4/xGklPEEfxsJBmQ8St8p1PlvM+kQ7IfExEXrA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7rRI3S4yfz9/zCPrZtsuEFcPxGmsLJP2mOiEyX4BLRn21tZeVDDLcaqjwfrYzG4bJtbLChJV9P5ep9qH1NXSw=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:8c9:0:b0:6ff:1cd7:533d with SMTP id 192-20020a3708c9000000b006ff1cd7533dmr991701qki.113.1671204847501; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 07:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 649336022844 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:34:06 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <167094324735.45634.6215476133161483286@ietfa.amsl.com> <ca431827-6090-dba7-6280-20bed8ebf37d@nohats.ca> <CAHw9_i+5aaasAdWU-pu-geGX6StrR6vzHTHmzcVGCo8FYruaxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_i+N=RG0bUjq9kUCTOj6eJRfpSyraF-+BVLTmwvgSHDHiA@mail.gmail.com> <0bb8aaec-ef12-09ec-9b7a-f7c1ad88f1cc@nohats.ca>
X-Superhuman-ID: lbqo7ch8.50e816c4-f3a4-4029-b227-e1620996070f
X-Superhuman-Draft-ID: draft00641f682d7d64ff
In-Reply-To: <0bb8aaec-ef12-09ec-9b7a-f7c1ad88f1cc@nohats.ca>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Superhuman Desktop (2022-12-15T23:05:58Z)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:34:06 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLQBZx74ROkPp+ozGyfibJFcvzngXP=OgX8QRQ6aHULow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000485ce905eff3b346"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/own77TsGH66TwlufL3nI_IKStAA>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2022 15:34:13 -0000

Works for me, and thank you very much!
W


On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 5:01 PM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: [IPsec] Warren Kumari's Discuss on
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with DISCUSS)
>
> Francesca / Warren: would these changes resolve your points? I kept the
> word deprecated as Roman pointed out that is exactly what the TLS
> 1.0/1.1 document did. But clarified that the usage guidance for the crypto
> algorithms is updated by this document. And I added a note for IANA to add
> a Note to the registry pages as Francesca recommended:
>
> --- draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08.txt 2022-12-15
> 16:31:35.171452645 -0500
> +++ draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-09.txt 2022-12-15
> 16:36:34.171942102 -0500
> @@ -16,11 +16,12 @@
>
> Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) has been deprecated and its
> specification in RFC2407, RFC2408 and RFC2409 have been moved to
> - Historic status. A number of old algorithms that are associated with
> - IKEv1, and not widely implemented for IKEv2 are deprecated as well.
> - This document updates RFC 8221 and RFC 8247 and adds a Status column
> - to the IANA IKEv2 Transform Type registries that shows the
> - deprecation status.
> + Historic status. This document updates RFC 8221 and RFC 8247 to
> + reflect the usage guidelines of old algorithms that are associated
> + with IKEv1 and are not specified or commonly implemented for IKEv2.
> + This document further updates the IANA IKEv2 Transform Type
> + registries to add a Status column where deprecation status can be
> + listed.
>
> [...]
>
> 7. IANA Considerations
>
> - This document instructs IANA to add an additional Status column to
> - the IKEv2 Transform Type registries and mark the following entries as
> - DEPRECATED:
> + This document instructs IANA to insert the following line at the top
> + of the Notes section of the 'Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Attributes'
> + registry and the '"Magic Numbers" for ISAKMP Protocol' registry: All
> + registries listed below have been closed, see RFCxxxx. [Note to RFC
> + Editor: change RFCxxx to this document's RFC number]
> +
> + This document further instructs IANA to add an additional Status
> + column to the IKEv2 Transform Type registries and mark the following
> + entries as DEPRECATED:
>