[IPsec] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with COMMENT)
Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 13 December 2022 21:32 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BDAC14CF19; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:32:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, kivinen@iki.fi, kivinen@iki.fi
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.2.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <167096714266.46253.7734469350241171737@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:32:22 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/UP9cp1ni7Lp4xNHo9tQDXPaI4BA>
Subject: [IPsec] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 21:32:22 -0000
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document. I would suggest requesting IANA to add a pointer to this specification in their current Notes (they currently have Notes pointing to 8221 and 8247). I would also suggest to expand on the meaning of the "Status" column and its allowed values, including said values meaning - I guess this is related to Warren's DISCUSS. It might seem unnecessary and self-explanatory to the authors, but it can't hurt to be exceedingly clear.
- [IPsec] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on dra… Francesca Palombini via Datatracker