Re: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-08: (with COMMENT)

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Mon, 07 November 2022 12:42 UTC

Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 20:42:12 +0800
Message-ID: <202211072042124575625@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <166781063036.36297.18160333094833245338@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: 166781063036.36297.18160333094833245338@ietfa.amsl.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: superuser@gmail.com
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state@ietf.org, ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/cewVdv1v4m6cdJ6uiU46xeT6Svk>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-08: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Hi Murray,



 


Thank you for the review and thoughtful comments.


Please check inline the proposed changes that will be incorporated into the next revision.


 


Best Regards,


Xiao Min



Original



From: MurrayKucherawyviaDatatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
Cc: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state@ietf.org <draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state@ietf.org>;ippm-chairs@ietf.org <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>;ippm@ietf.org <ippm@ietf.org>;marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com <marcus.ihlar@ericsson.com>;
Date: 2022年11月07日 16:43
Subject: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-08: (with COMMENT)


Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-08: No Objection
 
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
 
 
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/  
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
 
 
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state/
 
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I think the two IANA registries being created in this document are
under-specified.  I suggest enumerating the fields in each entry, describing
what they're for, and what their valid values are, before providing the initial
values.  As it stands, IANA has to read other parts of the document to infer
valid values for the first column in both cases.

[XM]>>> I'm not sure I fully understand your suggestion, so let me try. Propose the changes on IANA registries as below.

OLD

 SoP Description
 ---- -----------
 0b00 64-bit "PktID" and 64-bit "Cumulative" data NEW

 SoP (Size of POT) Description
 ---- -----------
 0b00 64-bit "PktID" and 64-bit "Cumulative" data
 0b01 Reserved for future standardization
 0b01 Reserved for future standardization 
 0b11 Reserved for future standardization
OLD

 TSF Description
 ---- -----------
 0b00 PTP Truncated Timestamp Format
 0b01 NTP 64-bit Timestamp Format
 0b10 POSIX-based Timestamp Format
 0b11 Reserved for future standardizationNEW

 TSF (TimeStamp Format) Description
 ---- -----------
 0b00 PTP Truncated Timestamp Format
 0b01 NTP 64-bit Timestamp Format
 0b10 POSIX-based Timestamp Format
 0b11 Reserved for future standardization


I also concur with Lars' point about the limited set of available values in

each registry, but I see the latest version dealt with that.

[ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-i… Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Re: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… xiao.min2
Re: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… Murray S. Kucherawy
Re: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… xiao.min2
Re: [ippm] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on dra… xiao.min2