Re: [ippm] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10

Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 13 December 2022 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F1FC1522CF; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:48:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IoalB7i9HFit; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:48:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3EF2C1522DA; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:48:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id qk9so38020461ejc.3; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:48:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TWPTxA5XiYBmS91Gv7gyYXl3zBNfSmR1s+XEe0aN2gU=; b=E2PwKMP+wckqqEwA0aIZc3EU82Oa524HeKnzGVgq5xUMueXJXUHMzkN2y6Ttu+i5br ghgnXNXjz5LSaMiIzDK3qPB1sWABCrnHWwpLbXufML29sqw07q71VUdfwX0l1e72pbwu OevEbKB7jbrUWf1oB+QRZj1EhJv7V5PasbfRpn/jPjsC9lWAopW/YITGI5InFThExCW5 h0yqSQTdoRHwbVlo76NC3CDK/j4A5HBXZJ4UbSU6SAk2oXxi+/dCHkruLEYY70kpdnLX 9tnPHIFaIdYz+qbWMxADUf4EEl3Z2zYRExNbORxP1ChlbGADGnNfd9AdvwLjXaBMHI4q P6JA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=TWPTxA5XiYBmS91Gv7gyYXl3zBNfSmR1s+XEe0aN2gU=; b=BuSdquV98UOynQTEnvXxJbnxD9xGKF8SdAnmDAL3GyyIiv/fMwuQLWb5huxdQ2KwH9 v6DHYcvwgk2gQ3YL+co+Nq90pqgMKXYeLNhlbbdSIL648utqqs6sMd8OgSK4tG+yTPqn p3beqs37VgBMA7IS919WSJv5+bQPUtkyTrHIAfFkCQ6D1LUIUaZhJBuSmAMW1hHtl79m F21464/mJf6f+oa3ne3eOAO3V/ZvLghfPpWELbyPnxce3HD/3hmHkQaeaTDcwtbCPUKW Z/F2KwftasHldW6gxkTOS9hbLhmSWgxOyVU4LlzqP59EJwQG/j0ZvmcmcLT3LQrxmS5b C6UA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmAeQkUjk9jJnre3r6hjmeWk0jPeR49S7TE1a/qREpxKHszahvy ulJf9/wZ2uTaMCvSSTjvbzsw7WyVZ92KD5CgctxbrYtv
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf6m3jSG+jtpXwVTydHHr+QypJPal3rKKwgMVezKmcUP2EmQl9wwDYI5+4uguSYAEaHN9y2grQqplLaJMwVH/94=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f6c1:b0:7c1:9b52:ceb0 with SMTP id jo1-20020a170906f6c100b007c19b52ceb0mr65610ejb.145.1670950119017; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:48:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF4+nEG8tgpPKpV4V9VA7pbp4Pzp-hg6ahoTZKkjkkPbK+tDdA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEG8tgpPKpV4V9VA7pbp4Pzp-hg6ahoTZKkjkkPbK+tDdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 11:48:27 -0500
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHXP9TpsVGts3ArFva-M=DZWMYgHP4=EwBk6i9KRvBAoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<rtg-ads@ietf.org> (rtg-ads@ietf.org)" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state.all@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048127b05efb864b9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/EsrTz1aOloyjQ_CSjP6-H-EH_go>
Subject: Re: [ippm] RtgDir Last Call review: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:48:58 -0000

Sorry, sent prematurely, please await the full message. :-(

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com


On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:46 AM Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
> The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
> drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes
> on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to
> the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please
> see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir
>
> Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
> would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
> Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
> discussion or by updating the draft.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-conf-state-10
> Reviewer: Donald Eastlake 3rd
> Review Date: 13 December 2022
> IETF LC End Date:
> Intended Status: Standards Track
>
> *Summary:*
> Choose from this list...
>
>    - No issues found. This document is ready for publication.
>    - This document is basically ready for publication but has nits that
>    should be considered prior to publication.
>    - I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should
>    be resolved before publication.
>    - I have significant concerns about this document and recommend that
>    the Routing ADs discuss these issues further with the authors.
>
> *Comments:*
>
>    - Please supply an overview of the draft quality and readability.
>    - Include anything else that you think will be helpful toward
>    understanding your review.
>
> *Major Issues:*
>
>    - Major issues are the type of concerns that will result in the
>    document being blocked until they are resolved. The Routing ADs will become
>    involved.
>    - Please include all of the major issues you have found. Give as much
>    context information as possible (e.g., section numbers, paragraph counts).
>    - If you find no major issues, please write: "No major issues found."
>
> *Minor Issues:*
>
>    - Minor issues are concerns about clarity or technical accuracy that
>    should be discussed and resolved before publication, but which would
>    normally be resolved between the authors and the reviewers.
>    - Please include all of the minor issues you have found. Give as much
>    context information as possible (e.g., section numbers, paragraph counts).
>    - If you find no minor issues, please write: "No minor issues found."
>
> *Nits:*
>
> Section 1, page 3:
> OLD
> Furthermore, each IOAM encapsulating node needs to establish NETCONF
> Connection with each IOAM transit and IOAM decapsulating node, the
> scalability can be an issue. NEW
> Furthermore, each IOAM encapsulating node needs to establish a NETCONF
> Connection with each IOAM transit and IOAM decapsulating node, so
> scalability can be an issue.
> Section 1, Page 4/5:
> Thanks,
> Donald
> ===============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>