xml-editor@w3.org from January to March 1998 by author

C M Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Suspected Error in XML 1.0 Specification (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Undefined terms (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: XML 1.0 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Comments on REC-xml-19980210 (Tuesday, 17 February)

Chris Maden

• REC-xml-19980210 errata (Tuesday, 17 February)

David_Wittler/ATL/Lotus@lotus.com

• Suspected Error in XML 1.0 Specification (Wednesday, 25 March)

Don R. Day

• How to obtain SPEC.DTD for REC-xml (Tuesday, 24 February)

Gerald Oskoboiny

• test of new list (Monday, 9 February)

Hakon Lie

• Display errors in XML 1.0 Recommendation, W3C StyleSheet (Tuesday, 10 February)

Jjcarr1@aol.com

• Error found in W3C Recommendation 10-February-1998 (Monday, 23 February)

John D. Ramsdell

• Re: Comments on REC-xml-19980210 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Comments on REC-xml-19980210 (Tuesday, 17 February)

Lars Marius Garshol

• Typo in XML 1.0 recommendation? (Tuesday, 10 March)

Mark Hennes

• XML 1.0 (Wednesday, 18 March)

Michael Gnatz

• [xml-editor] <none> (Thursday, 5 March)

Per-Ake Ling

• Error in XML 1.0 (Monday, 23 March)

Raph Levien

• Minor nit in XML spec (Sunday, 22 March)

RMouritz@cccis.com

• Undefined terms (Friday, 20 March)

Scott Semyan

• The XML spec looks horrible on Internet Explorer 3.02 on WinNT 4. 0 (Tuesday, 10 February)

Susan Lesch

• Display errors in XML 1.0 Recommendation, W3C StyleSheet (Tuesday, 10 February)

Tim Bray

• Re: Suspected Error in XML 1.0 Specification (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: XML 1.0 (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: The XML spec looks horrible on Internet Explorer 3.02 on WinNT 4. 0 (Wednesday, 11 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 25 March 1998 12:23:05 UTC