Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR for Issue 1743#1744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 27, 2017
Merged

PR for Issue 1743 #1744

merged 1 commit into from Sep 27, 2017

Conversation

tfrancart
Copy link
Contributor

@tfrancart tfrancart commented Sep 20, 2017

See #1743

  • deleted inverse properties
  • Changed definition of "Legislation" to make it clear this is a document
  • Fixed Range on legislationType (CategoryCode)
  • Added legislationJurisdiction as a subproperty of spatialCoverage
  • Fixed Definitive into DefinitiveLegalValue to align with other values
  • expanded the definition of legislationIdentifier to clarify that it can apply to string or URIs
  • fixed and adjusted the examples accordingly (But I still don't know how to express inverse properties in microdata)

		- Changed definition of "Legislation" to make it clear this is a document
		- Fixed Range on legislationType (CategoryCode)
		- Added legislationJurisdiction as a subproperty of spatialCoverage
		- Fixed Definitive into DefinitiveLegalValue to align with other values
		- expanded the definition of legislationIdentifier to clarify that it can apply to string or URIs
		- fixed and adjusted the examples accordingly
@tfrancart tfrancart changed the title Issue 1743 PR for Issue 1743 Sep 20, 2017
@danbri
Copy link
Contributor

danbri commented Sep 27, 2017

Could you file a separate bug to get some decent inverse property examples in Microdata? /cc @chaals

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants