UTF-8 support fix for RDFa files#111
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RDFa files list passed directly to RDFAParser change from using ET.fromString() which expects ascii, to an ET.parse which is passed an UTF8 parser read_schemas adjusted to send file list instead of list of strings to parser.
danbri
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2014
UTF-8 support fix for RDFa files
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Error when reading non-ascii characters from .rdfa files.
Fix:
parsers.py
RDFa files list passed directly to RDFAParser.
Change from using ET.fromString() which expects ascii, to an ET.parse which is passed an UTF8 parser
api.py
read_schemas adjusted to send file list instead of list of strings to parser.