Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Import IESG artifacts into the datatracker#6908

Merged
merged 35 commits into from Feb 20, 2024
Merged

feat: Import IESG artifacts into the datatracker #6908

merged 35 commits into from Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

rjsparks
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 13 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (187c2c5) 88.98% compared to head (0572e68) 88.97%.
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 0572e68 differs from pull request most recent head 2bf1bae. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2bf1bae to get more accurate results

Files Patch % Lines
ietf/meeting/models.py 70.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
ietf/group/views.py 91.17% 3 Missing ⚠️
ietf/doc/models.py 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
ietf/doc/views_material.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
ietf/meeting/templatetags/proceedings_filters.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
ietf/meeting/utils.py 92.85% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6908      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.98%   88.97%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         291      291              
  Lines       40717    40766      +49     
==========================================
+ Hits        36233    36270      +37     
- Misses       4484     4496      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@jennifer-richards jennifer-richards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only partially reviewed, but I think the tz handling is fragile and should probably be fixed. I expect that the dev machines will show incorrect times on migrated data. (If not, then I must be mistaken in my comments.)

ietf/doc/views_doc.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ietf/group/management/commands/import_iesg_appeals.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ietf/meeting/management/commands/import_iesg_minutes.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jennifer-richards jennifer-richards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments - I think the tz stuff is still in need of changes.

The n+1 business looks good to me, but I'm still thinking about how it can be made more maintainable.

ietf/group/views.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ietf/meeting/models.py Show resolved Hide resolved
ietf/meeting/management/commands/import_iesg_minutes.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ietf/meeting/management/commands/import_iesg_minutes.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@jennifer-richards jennifer-richards left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My concerns are addressed.

I'm a little uneasy about the monkey patched optimizations - it'd be nice to find a better pattern for that. I don't see a reason to hold this up for solving that, though.

@rjsparks rjsparks marked this pull request as draft January 19, 2024 21:31
@rjsparks rjsparks marked this pull request as ready for review February 20, 2024 17:21
@rjsparks rjsparks merged commit 8cb7f3d into main Feb 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@jennifer-richards jennifer-richards deleted the feat/iesgart branch February 23, 2024 19:24
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants