What is the difference between datatracker.ietf.org & www.rfc-editor.org and which is Official URL for RFC ? #7259
Replies: 6 comments 2 replies
-
|
It'd be helpful to have official guidance from IETF for here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I hope these resources might help you: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If you look at rfcs citing other rfcs, these all use rfc-editor.org. It couldn’t be more official. Sent from mobile, sorry for terseOn 26. Mar 2024, at 14:09, Jxck ***@***.***> wrote:
It'd be helpful to have official guidance from IETF for here.
If I missed it, please let me know.
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
You should point to rfc-editor.org However, be aware that the current style guide says to point to There is ongoing discussion about making the page referenced contain both content and metadata. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Got it. Thanks.
Hmm, it seems hard choice for me...🤔 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
Some RFC has multiple URL.
IIUC, tools.ietf.org is deprecated and redirect to datatracker.
datatracker has some metadata for RFC and rfc-editor looks focusing on reading content itself.
But I don't know what is the purpose to have multiple site and how they utilize.
Q: if I put link into some official document (like Paper, Article, Manual, Book etc).
Which is the best URL to link RFC ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions