Skip to content

Issues: IETF-OPSAWG-WG/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
39 Open 25 Closed
39 Open 25 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Can there be multiple "user application" option strings for an SHB?
#13 opened Aug 22, 2015 by hadrielk updated Aug 22, 2015
1
Can there be multiple "os" option strings for an SHB?
#12 opened Aug 22, 2015 by hadrielk updated Aug 23, 2015
1
Can there be multiple "hardware" option strings for an SHB?
#11 opened Aug 22, 2015 by hadrielk updated Aug 23, 2015
1
Need to figure out what to do with Experimental Blocks
#17 opened Aug 22, 2015 by hadrielk updated Aug 23, 2015
1
Need to determine how to assign new Block Types/Option Codes in future
#23 opened Aug 23, 2015 by hadrielk updated Aug 23, 2015
1
Add Implementation section
#29 opened Aug 26, 2015 by alagoutte updated Aug 26, 2015
1
Is extraneous padding legal?
#26 opened Aug 25, 2015 by hadrielk updated Aug 26, 2015
1
Comments on 4.1. Section Header Block - don't allow multiple SHB's
#42 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711 updated Nov 22, 2016
Comments on 4.2. Interface Description Block - SnapLen field can be removed
#43 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711 updated Nov 22, 2016
Comments on 4.4. Simple Packet Block - please deprecate
#45 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711 updated Nov 22, 2016
Comments on 4.6. Interface Statistics Block - please deprecate
#46 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711 updated Nov 22, 2016
Comments on 4.3. Enhanced Packet Block - specify timestamps as a 64 bit vaule
#44 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711 updated Nov 22, 2016
Comments on 5. Experimental Blocks - please drop/deprecate
#47 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711 updated Nov 22, 2016
1
Comments on 3.1. General Block Structure - endian and padding
#41 opened Nov 22, 2016 by erik4711 updated Nov 25, 2016
14
Custom link-layer types, similar to custom blocks and options
#52 opened Aug 10, 2018 by guyharris updated Aug 18, 2018
1
Proposal: Additional option fields for wireless packet capture
#48 opened Nov 13, 2017 by ryankurte updated Jan 5, 2019
50
Auto-Generate
#4 opened Aug 18, 2015 by alagoutte updated Feb 6, 2019
1
7
What is the ordering for comment option strings?
#14 opened Aug 22, 2015 by hadrielk updated Feb 6, 2019
2
More things to do
#18 opened Aug 22, 2015 by hadrielk updated Feb 6, 2019
3
Is it legal for an EPB capture length value to be different than snaplen/origlen?
#35 opened Aug 29, 2015 by hadrielk updated Feb 6, 2019
7
Is an empty option/record string valid?
#32 opened Aug 26, 2015 by hadrielk updated Feb 6, 2019
2
Need to specify the IDB if_tzone option format
#24 opened Aug 23, 2015 by hadrielk updated Feb 6, 2019
3
Some issues with the Interface Statistics Block
#58 opened Feb 14, 2019 by guyharris updated Feb 14, 2019
question how to timestamp end of packet
#61 opened Apr 5, 2019 by horsth updated Apr 7, 2019
1
Release the RFC into public domain
#49 opened Dec 6, 2017 by KOLANICH updated Feb 10, 2020
2
ProTip! Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.