Talk:Slowloris (computer security)

Computing: Networking / Software / Websites Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Which software is unaffected?[edit]

The section "Mitigating the Slowloris attack" claims that some HTTP server software is unaffected yet doesn't list any. But as I understand the HTTP spec (RFC 2616), any server that responds in an HTTP-conforming way to a connection initiated by a slow modem (e.g. V.32bis at 14.4 kbps) is affected unless it drops the connection after the client sends too many request headers. What software is not affected and why not? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 17:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The attack is more pronounced on Apache due to the fact that Apache has a MaxClients setting which imposes a restriction on the number of simultaneous connections the web server will allow. SlowLoris uses slow connections to exploit this limitation, but that isn't the only way to do so.

Servers may still be vulnerable even if they don't implement a hard limit on the number of of connections, as less than optimum connection handling can lead to the depletion of CPU and RAM resources on the server. This is classically known as the C10k problem. Motoma (talk | stalk) 21:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lighttpd affected or not?[edit]

Lighttpd is listed in the "affected servers" list, but later given as an example of a server that does not have the problem, along with nginx. Which is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.135.19.243 (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Slowloris (computer security). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Slowloris (computer security). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090822001255/http://ha.ckers.org:80/slowloris/ to http://ha.ckers.org/slowloris/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090822001255/http://ha.ckers.org:80/slowloris/ to http://ha.ckers.org/slowloris/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:50, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]