skip to main content
10.1145/2668930.2688045acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Green Domino Incentives: Impact of Energy-aware Adaptive Link Rate Policies in Routers

Published:31 January 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

To reduce energy consumption of lightly loaded routers, operators are increasingly incentivized to use Adaptive Link Rate (ALR) policies and techniques. These techniques typically save energy by adapting link service rates or by identifying opportune times to put interfaces into low-power sleep/idle modes. In this paper, we present a trace-based analysis of the impact that a router implementing these techniques has on the neighboring routers. We show that policies adapting the service rate at larger time scales, either by changing the service rate of the link interface itself or by changing which redundant heterogeneous link is active, typically have large positive effects on neighboring routers, with the downstream routers being able to achieve up-to 30% additional energy savings due to the upstream routers implementing ALR policies. Policies that save energy by temporarily placing the interface in a low-power sleep/idle mode, typically has smaller, but positive, impact on neighboring routers. Best are hybrid policies that use a combination of these two techniques. The hybrid policies consistently achieve the biggest energy savings, and have positive cascading effects on surrounding routers. Our results show that implementation of ALR policies can contribute to large-scale positive domino incentive effects, as they further increase the potential energy savings seen by those neighboring routers that consider implementing ALR techniques, while satisfying performance guarantees on the routers themselves.

References

  1. Ieee 802.3az energy efficient ethernet: Build greener networks. White Paper from Cisco and Intel (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ananthanarayanan, G., and Katz, R. H. Greening the switch. In Proc. OSDI (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barroso, L., and Holze, U. The case for energy-proportional computing. IEEE Computer 40, 12 (April 2007), 33--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bolla, R., Bruschi, R., Davoli, F., and Cucchietti, F. Energy Efficiency in the Future Internet: A Survey of Existing Approaches and Trends in Energy-Aware Fixed Network Infrastructures. IEEE Communications Survey and Tutorials 13, 2 (2011), 223--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bolla, R., Davoli, F., Christensen, K., Cucchietti, F., and Suresh, S. The potential impact of green technologies in next-generation wireline networks: Is there room for energy saving optimization? IEEE Communications Magazine 49, 8 (Aug 2011), 80--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Burke, P. J. The output of a queueing system. Operations Research 4, 6 (1956), 699--704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chiaraviglio, L., Mellia, M., and Neri, F. Energy-aware backbone networks: A case study. In Proc. IEEE GreenComm (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chiaraviglio, L., Mellia, M., and Neri, F. Reducing power consumption in backbone networks. In Proc. IEEE ICC (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cho, K., Mitsuya, K., and Kato, A. Traffic data repository at the WIDE project. In Proc. USENIX ATC (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christensen, K., Reviriego, P., Nordman, B. and Bennett, M., Mostowfi, M., and Maestro, J. Ieee 802.3az: The road to energy efficcient ethernet. IEEE Communications Magazine 48, 11 (2010), 50--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cleary, J. G. Wand project at university of waikato, nz. In Proc. HPN: Measurements and Analysis Collaborations Workshop (1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan, J., Xu, J., Ammar, M. H., and Moon, S. B. Prefix-preserving ip address anonymization: measurement-based security evaluation and a new cryptography-based scheme. Computer Networks (Oct. 2004), 253--272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gunaratne, C., Christensen, K., and Nordman, B. Managing energy consumption costs in dektop PCs and LAN switches with proxying, split tcp connections, and scaling of link speed. International Journal of Network Management 15 (Sept. 2005), 297--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gunaratne, C., Christensen, K., Nordman, B., and Suen, S. Reducing the energy consumption of ethernet with an adaptive link rate (alr). IEEE Trans. on Computers 57, 4 (April 2008), 448--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gupta, M., Grover, S., and Singh, S. A feasibility study for power management in LAN switches.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta, M., and Singh, S. Greening of the internet. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gupta, M., and Singh, S. Dynamic ethernet link shutdown for energy conservation on ethernet links. In Proc. IEEE ICC (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hähnel, M., Döbel, B., Völp, M., and Härtig, H. ebond: energy saving in heterogeneous R.A.I.N. In Proc. e-Energy (May 2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hanay, Y. S., Li, W., Tessier, R., and Wolf, T. Saving energy and improving TCP throughput with rate adaptation in ethernet. In Proc. IEEE ICC (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hays, R. Active/idle toggling with low-power idle. Presentation for IEEE 802.3az Task Force (Jan 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hohn, N., Papagiannaki, K., and Veitch, D. Capturing router congestion and delay. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking 17, 3 (June 2009), 789--802. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Huang, T.-Y., Handigol, N., Heller, B., McKeown, N., and Johari, R. Confused, timid, and unstable: Picking a video streaming rate is hard. In Proc. IMC (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kleinrock, L. Communications Nets: Stochastic Message Flow and Delay. McGraw Hill, 1964. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Labovitz, C., Iekel-Johnson, S., McPherson, D., Oberheide, J., and Jahanian, F. Internet inter-domain traffic. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lange, C. Energy-related Aspects in Backbone Networks. In Proc. ECOC (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Mao, Z. M., Rexford, J., Wang, J., and Katz, R. H. Towards an accurate as-level traceroute tool. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Meisner, D., Gold, B. T., and Wenisch, T. F. Powernap: Eliminating server idle power. In Proc. ASPLOS (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nedevschi, S., Popa, L., Iannaccone, G., Ratnasamy, S., and Wetherall, D. Reducing network energy consumption via sleeping and rate-adaptation. In Proc. NSDI (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pinedo, M., and Wolff, R. W. A comparison between tandem queues with dependent and independent service time. Operations Research 30, 3 (1982), 464--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Restrepo, J., Gruber, C., and Machoca, C. Energy profile aware routing. In Proc. IEEE GreenComm (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Reviriego, P., Christensen, K., Rabanillo, J., and Maestro, J. An initial evaluation of energy efficient ethernet. IEEE Communications Letters 15 (May 2011), 578--580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sandmann, W. Delays in a series of queues with correlated service times. Journal of Networks and Computer Applications 35 (2012), 1415--1423. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tucker et al., R. Energy Consumption in IP Networks. ECOC (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Weiser, M., Welch, B., Demers, A., and Shenker, S. Scheduling for reduced cpu energy. In Proc. USENIX OSDI (1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Wierman, A., Andrew, L. L. H., and Tang, A. Power-aware speed scaling in processor sharing systems. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Zhang, B., Sabhanatarajan, K., Gordon-Ross, A., and George, A. Real-time performance analysis of adaptive link rate. In Proc. IEEE LCN (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang, G. Q., Yang, Q. F., and Cheng, T. Z. Evolution of the internet and its cores. New Journal of Physics 10, 12 (2008), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Green Domino Incentives: Impact of Energy-aware Adaptive Link Rate Policies in Routers

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICPE '15: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering
        January 2015
        366 pages
        ISBN:9781450332484
        DOI:10.1145/2668930

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 January 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ICPE '15 Paper Acceptance Rate23of74submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate252of851submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader