Ballot for draft-ietf-lamps-norevavail
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Thanks for the discussion. I've updated my ballot to Yes
Please find these observations during my review of this document. Feel free to use or ignore. The history section was a nice addition to understand better the historical progress. For easy of read the line numbers used are added as shown in the idnits tool. 2 Network Working Group R. Housley I suspect there is minor cosmetic issue here. The WG should be LAMPS instead of Network Working Group? 368 [X.690] ITU-T, "Information technology -- ASN.1 encoding rules: 369 Specification of Basic Encoding Rules (BER), Canonical 370 Encoding Rules (CER) and Distinguished Encoding Rules 371 (DER)", ITU-T Recommendation X.690, ISO/IEC 8825-1-2021, 372 February 2021, <https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.690>. This location has some documents regarding X.690, but not so trivial to find the document itself. Is this the erratum document? X.690 (2021) Erratum 1 (09/21) Erratum 1 (09/2021) to Rec. X.690 (2021) | ISO/IEC 8825-1:2021 I am wondering if the base and erratum document should not be mentioned individually as a reference ? However i have no experience with handling ITU documents as normative reference.
Thanks for addressing promptly my previous DISCUSS :-) For archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/ULs3l5QPoW8Oes-bmEbwNHV3wBU/