Showing 1–50 of 54 results for author: Thakurta, A

Efficient and Near-Optimal Noise Generation for Streaming Differential Privacy

Authors: Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, H. Brendan McMahan, Krishna Pillutla, Thomas Steinke, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: In the task of differentially private (DP) continual counting, we receive a stream of increments and our goal is to output an approximate running total of these increments, without revealing too much about any specific increment. Despite its simplicity, differentially private continual counting has attracted significant attention both in theory and in practice. Existing algorithms for differential… ▽ More In the task of differentially private (DP) continual counting, we receive a stream of increments and our goal is to output an approximate running total of these increments, without revealing too much about any specific increment. Despite its simplicity, differentially private continual counting has attracted significant attention both in theory and in practice. Existing algorithms for differentially private continual counting are either inefficient in terms of their space usage or add an excessive amount of noise, inducing suboptimal utility. The most practical DP continual counting algorithms add carefully correlated Gaussian noise to the values. The task of choosing the covariance for this noise can be expressed in terms of factoring the lower-triangular matrix of ones (which computes prefix sums). We present two approaches from this class (for different parameter regimes) that achieve near-optimal utility for DP continual counting and only require logarithmic or polylogarithmic space (and time). Our first approach is based on a space-efficient streaming matrix multiplication algorithm for a class of Toeplitz matrices. We show that to instantiate this algorithm for DP continual counting, it is sufficient to find a low-degree rational function that approximates the square root on a circle in the complex plane. We then apply and extend tools from approximation theory to achieve this. We also derive efficient closed-forms for the objective function for arbitrarily many steps, and show direct numerical optimization yields a highly practical solution to the problem. Our second approach combines our first approach with a recursive construction similar to the binary tree mechanism. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2024; v1 submitted 25 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimation

Authors: Gavin Brown, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Georgina Evans, Daogao Liu, Adam Smith, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We provide an improved analysis of standard differentially private gradient descent for linear regression under the squared error loss. Under modest assumptions on the input, we characterize the distribution of the iterate at each time step. Our analysis leads to new results on the algorithm's accuracy: for a proper fixed choice of hyperparameters, the sample complexity depends only linearly on… ▽ More We provide an improved analysis of standard differentially private gradient descent for linear regression under the squared error loss. Under modest assumptions on the input, we characterize the distribution of the iterate at each time step. Our analysis leads to new results on the algorithm's accuracy: for a proper fixed choice of hyperparameters, the sample complexity depends only linearly on the dimension of the data. This matches the dimension-dependence of the (non-private) ordinary least squares estimator as well as that of recent private algorithms that rely on sophisticated adaptive gradient-clipping schemes (Varshney et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023). Our analysis of the iterates' distribution also allows us to construct confidence intervals for the empirical optimizer which adapt automatically to the variance of the algorithm on a particular data set. We validate our theorems through experiments on synthetic data. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: 22 pages, 11 figures

Improved Differentially Private and Lazy Online Convex Optimization

Authors: Naman Agarwal, Satyen Kale, Karan Singh, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta

Abstract: We study the task of $(ε, δ)$-differentially private online convex optimization (OCO). In the online setting, the release of each distinct decision or iterate carries with it the potential for privacy loss. This problem has a long history of research starting with Jain et al. [2012] and the best known results for the regime of ε not being very small are presented in Agarwal et al. [2023]. In this… ▽ More We study the task of $(ε, δ)$-differentially private online convex optimization (OCO). In the online setting, the release of each distinct decision or iterate carries with it the potential for privacy loss. This problem has a long history of research starting with Jain et al. [2012] and the best known results for the regime of ε not being very small are presented in Agarwal et al. [2023]. In this paper we improve upon the results of Agarwal et al. [2023] in terms of the dimension factors as well as removing the requirement of smoothness. Our results are now the best known rates for DP-OCO in this regime. Our algorithms builds upon the work of [Asi et al., 2023] which introduced the idea of explicitly limiting the number of switches via rejection sampling. The main innovation in our algorithm is the use of sampling from a strongly log-concave density which allows us to trade-off the dimension factors better leading to improved results. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2023; v1 submitted 15 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Privacy Amplification for Matrix Mechanisms

Authors: Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Thomas Steinke, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Privacy amplification exploits randomness in data selection to provide tighter differential privacy (DP) guarantees. This analysis is key to DP-SGD's success in machine learning, but, is not readily applicable to the newer state-of-the-art algorithms. This is because these algorithms, known as DP-FTRL, use the matrix mechanism to add correlated noise instead of independent noise as in DP-SGD. In… ▽ More Privacy amplification exploits randomness in data selection to provide tighter differential privacy (DP) guarantees. This analysis is key to DP-SGD's success in machine learning, but, is not readily applicable to the newer state-of-the-art algorithms. This is because these algorithms, known as DP-FTRL, use the matrix mechanism to add correlated noise instead of independent noise as in DP-SGD. In this paper, we propose "MMCC", the first algorithm to analyze privacy amplification via sampling for any generic matrix mechanism. MMCC is nearly tight in that it approaches a lower bound as $ε\to0$. To analyze correlated outputs in MMCC, we prove that they can be analyzed as if they were independent, by conditioning them on prior outputs. Our "conditional composition theorem" has broad utility: we use it to show that the noise added to binary-tree-DP-FTRL can asymptotically match the noise added to DP-SGD with amplification. Our amplification algorithm also has practical empirical utility: we show it leads to significant improvement in the privacy-utility trade-offs for DP-FTRL algorithms on standard benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2024; v1 submitted 24 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: Appearing in ICLR 2024. Changes made to match the conference version of the paper

Private Learning with Public Features

Authors: Walid Krichene, Nicolas Mayoraz, Steffen Rendle, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Li Zhang

Abstract: We study a class of private learning problems in which the data is a join of private and public features. This is often the case in private personalization tasks such as recommendation or ad prediction, in which features related to individuals are sensitive, while features related to items (the movies or songs to be recommended, or the ads to be shown to users) are publicly available and do not re… ▽ More We study a class of private learning problems in which the data is a join of private and public features. This is often the case in private personalization tasks such as recommendation or ad prediction, in which features related to individuals are sensitive, while features related to items (the movies or songs to be recommended, or the ads to be shown to users) are publicly available and do not require protection. A natural question is whether private algorithms can achieve higher utility in the presence of public features. We give a positive answer for multi-encoder models where one of the encoders operates on public features. We develop new algorithms that take advantage of this separation by only protecting certain sufficient statistics (instead of adding noise to the gradient). This method has a guaranteed utility improvement for linear regression, and importantly, achieves the state of the art on two standard private recommendation benchmarks, demonstrating the importance of methods that adapt to the private-public feature separation. △ Less

Submitted 23 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Correlated Noise Provably Beats Independent Noise for Differentially Private Learning

Authors: Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Krishna Pillutla, Arun Ganesh, Thomas Steinke, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Differentially private learning algorithms inject noise into the learning process. While the most common private learning algorithm, DP-SGD, adds independent Gaussian noise in each iteration, recent work on matrix factorization mechanisms has shown empirically that introducing correlations in the noise can greatly improve their utility. We characterize the asymptotic learning utility for any choic… ▽ More Differentially private learning algorithms inject noise into the learning process. While the most common private learning algorithm, DP-SGD, adds independent Gaussian noise in each iteration, recent work on matrix factorization mechanisms has shown empirically that introducing correlations in the noise can greatly improve their utility. We characterize the asymptotic learning utility for any choice of the correlation function, giving precise analytical bounds for linear regression and as the solution to a convex program for general convex functions. We show, using these bounds, how correlated noise provably improves upon vanilla DP-SGD as a function of problem parameters such as the effective dimension and condition number. Moreover, our analytical expression for the near-optimal correlation function circumvents the cubic complexity of the semi-definite program used to optimize the noise correlation matrix in previous work. We validate our theory with experiments on private deep learning. Our work matches or outperforms prior work while being efficient both in terms of compute and memory. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2024; v1 submitted 10 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, and Krishna Pillutla contributed equally

Journal ref: ICLR 2024

(Amplified) Banded Matrix Factorization: A unified approach to private training

Authors: Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Arun Ganesh, Ryan McKenna, H. Brendan McMahan, Keith Rush, Abhradeep Thakurta, Zheng Xu

Abstract: Matrix factorization (MF) mechanisms for differential privacy (DP) have substantially improved the state-of-the-art in privacy-utility-computation tradeoffs for ML applications in a variety of scenarios, but in both the centralized and federated settings there remain instances where either MF cannot be easily applied, or other algorithms provide better tradeoffs (typically, as $ε$ becomes small).… ▽ More Matrix factorization (MF) mechanisms for differential privacy (DP) have substantially improved the state-of-the-art in privacy-utility-computation tradeoffs for ML applications in a variety of scenarios, but in both the centralized and federated settings there remain instances where either MF cannot be easily applied, or other algorithms provide better tradeoffs (typically, as $ε$ becomes small). In this work, we show how MF can subsume prior state-of-the-art algorithms in both federated and centralized training settings, across all privacy budgets. The key technique throughout is the construction of MF mechanisms with banded matrices (lower-triangular matrices with at most $\hat{b}$ nonzero bands including the main diagonal). For cross-device federated learning (FL), this enables multiple-participations with a relaxed device participation schema compatible with practical FL infrastructure (as demonstrated by a production deployment). In the centralized setting, we prove that banded matrices enjoy the same privacy amplification results as the ubiquitous DP-SGD algorithm, but can provide strictly better performance in most scenarios -- this lets us always at least match DP-SGD, and often outperform it. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 13 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 34 pages, 13 figures

Training Private Models That Know What They Don't Know

Authors: Stephan Rabanser, Anvith Thudi, Abhradeep Thakurta, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Nicolas Papernot

Abstract: Training reliable deep learning models which avoid making overconfident but incorrect predictions is a longstanding challenge. This challenge is further exacerbated when learning has to be differentially private: protection provided to sensitive data comes at the price of injecting additional randomness into the learning process. In this work, we conduct a thorough empirical investigation of selec… ▽ More Training reliable deep learning models which avoid making overconfident but incorrect predictions is a longstanding challenge. This challenge is further exacerbated when learning has to be differentially private: protection provided to sensitive data comes at the price of injecting additional randomness into the learning process. In this work, we conduct a thorough empirical investigation of selective classifiers -- that can abstain when they are unsure -- under a differential privacy constraint. We find that several popular selective prediction approaches are ineffective in a differentially private setting as they increase the risk of privacy leakage. At the same time, we identify that a recent approach that only uses checkpoints produced by an off-the-shelf private learning algorithm stands out as particularly suitable under DP. Further, we show that differential privacy does not just harm utility but also degrades selective classification performance. To analyze this effect across privacy levels, we propose a novel evaluation mechanism which isolate selective prediction performance across model utility levels. Our experimental results show that recovering the performance level attainable by non-private models is possible but comes at a considerable coverage cost as the privacy budget decreases. △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Faster Differentially Private Convex Optimization via Second-Order Methods

Authors: Arun Ganesh, Mahdi Haghifam, Thomas Steinke, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Differentially private (stochastic) gradient descent is the workhorse of DP private machine learning in both the convex and non-convex settings. Without privacy constraints, second-order methods, like Newton's method, converge faster than first-order methods like gradient descent. In this work, we investigate the prospect of using the second-order information from the loss function to accelerate D… ▽ More Differentially private (stochastic) gradient descent is the workhorse of DP private machine learning in both the convex and non-convex settings. Without privacy constraints, second-order methods, like Newton's method, converge faster than first-order methods like gradient descent. In this work, we investigate the prospect of using the second-order information from the loss function to accelerate DP convex optimization. We first develop a private variant of the regularized cubic Newton method of Nesterov and Polyak, and show that for the class of strongly convex loss functions, our algorithm has quadratic convergence and achieves the optimal excess loss. We then design a practical second-order DP algorithm for the unconstrained logistic regression problem. We theoretically and empirically study the performance of our algorithm. Empirical results show our algorithm consistently achieves the best excess loss compared to other baselines and is 10-40x faster than DP-GD/DP-SGD. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment

Authors: Rachel Cummings, Damien Desfontaines, David Evans, Roxana Geambasu, Yangsibo Huang, Matthew Jagielski, Peter Kairouz, Gautam Kamath, Sewoong Oh, Olga Ohrimenko, Nicolas Papernot, Ryan Rogers, Milan Shen, Shuang Song, Weijie Su, Andreas Terzis, Abhradeep Thakurta, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Yu-Xiang Wang, Li Xiong, Sergey Yekhanin, Da Yu, Huanyu Zhang, Wanrong Zhang

Abstract: In this article, we present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP), with a focus of advancing DP's deployment in real-world applications. Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier," a workshop held in July 20… ▽ More In this article, we present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP), with a focus of advancing DP's deployment in real-world applications. Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier," a workshop held in July 2022 with experts from industry, academia, and the public sector seeking answers to broad questions pertaining to privacy and its implications in the design of industry-grade systems. This article aims to provide a reference point for the algorithmic and design decisions within the realm of privacy, highlighting important challenges and potential research directions. Covering a wide spectrum of topics, this article delves into the infrastructure needs for designing private systems, methods for achieving better privacy/utility trade-offs, performing privacy attacks and auditing, as well as communicating privacy with broader audiences and stakeholders. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2024; v1 submitted 14 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Differentially Private Stream Processing at Scale

Authors: Bing Zhang, Vadym Doroshenko, Peter Kairouz, Thomas Steinke, Abhradeep Thakurta, Ziyin Ma, Eidan Cohen, Himani Apte, Jodi Spacek

Abstract: We design, to the best of our knowledge, the first differentially private (DP) stream aggregation processing system at scale. Our system -- Differential Privacy SQL Pipelines (DP-SQLP) -- is built using a streaming framework similar to Spark streaming, and is built on top of the Spanner database and the F1 query engine from Google. Towards designing DP-SQLP we make both algorithmic and systemic… ▽ More We design, to the best of our knowledge, the first differentially private (DP) stream aggregation processing system at scale. Our system -- Differential Privacy SQL Pipelines (DP-SQLP) -- is built using a streaming framework similar to Spark streaming, and is built on top of the Spanner database and the F1 query engine from Google. Towards designing DP-SQLP we make both algorithmic and systemic advances, namely, we (i) design a novel (user-level) DP key selection algorithm that can operate on an unbounded set of possible keys, and can scale to one billion keys that users have contributed, (ii) design a preemptive execution scheme for DP key selection that avoids enumerating all the keys at each triggering time, and (iii) use algorithmic techniques from DP continual observation to release a continual DP histogram of user contributions to different keys over the stream length. We empirically demonstrate the efficacy by obtaining at least $16\times$ reduction in error over meaningful baselines we consider. We implemented a streaming differentially private user impressions for Google Shopping with DP-SQLP. The streaming DP algorithms are further applied to Google Trends. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2024; v1 submitted 31 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy

Authors: Natalia Ponomareva, Hussein Hazimeh, Alex Kurakin, Zheng Xu, Carson Denison, H. Brendan McMahan, Sergei Vassilvitskii, Steve Chien, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: ML models are ubiquitous in real world applications and are a constant focus of research. At the same time, the community has started to realize the importance of protecting the privacy of ML training data. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for making formal statements about data anonymization. However, while some adoption of DP has happened in industry, attempts to apply DP t… ▽ More ML models are ubiquitous in real world applications and are a constant focus of research. At the same time, the community has started to realize the importance of protecting the privacy of ML training data. Differential Privacy (DP) has become a gold standard for making formal statements about data anonymization. However, while some adoption of DP has happened in industry, attempts to apply DP to real world complex ML models are still few and far between. The adoption of DP is hindered by limited practical guidance of what DP protection entails, what privacy guarantees to aim for, and the difficulty of achieving good privacy-utility-computation trade-offs for ML models. Tricks for tuning and maximizing performance are scattered among papers or stored in the heads of practitioners. Furthermore, the literature seems to present conflicting evidence on how and whether to apply architectural adjustments and which components are "safe" to use with DP. This work is a self-contained guide that gives an in-depth overview of the field of DP ML and presents information about achieving the best possible DP ML model with rigorous privacy guarantees. Our target audience is both researchers and practitioners. Researchers interested in DP for ML will benefit from a clear overview of current advances and areas for improvement. We include theory-focused sections that highlight important topics such as privacy accounting and its assumptions, and convergence. For a practitioner, we provide a background in DP theory and a clear step-by-step guide for choosing an appropriate privacy definition and approach, implementing DP training, potentially updating the model architecture, and tuning hyperparameters. For both researchers and practitioners, consistently and fully reporting privacy guarantees is critical, and so we propose a set of specific best practices for stating guarantees. △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2023; v1 submitted 1 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Journal ref: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 77 (2023) 1113-1201

Private (Stochastic) Non-Convex Optimization Revisited: Second-Order Stationary Points and Excess Risks

Authors: Arun Ganesh, Daogao Liu, Sewoong Oh, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We consider the problem of minimizing a non-convex objective while preserving the privacy of the examples in the training data. Building upon the previous variance-reduced algorithm SpiderBoost, we introduce a new framework that utilizes two different kinds of gradient oracles. The first kind of oracles can estimate the gradient of one point, and the second kind of oracles, less precise and more c… ▽ More We consider the problem of minimizing a non-convex objective while preserving the privacy of the examples in the training data. Building upon the previous variance-reduced algorithm SpiderBoost, we introduce a new framework that utilizes two different kinds of gradient oracles. The first kind of oracles can estimate the gradient of one point, and the second kind of oracles, less precise and more cost-effective, can estimate the gradient difference between two points. SpiderBoost uses the first kind periodically, once every few steps, while our framework proposes using the first oracle whenever the total drift has become large and relies on the second oracle otherwise. This new framework ensures the gradient estimations remain accurate all the time, resulting in improved rates for finding second-order stationary points. Moreover, we address a more challenging task of finding the global minima of a non-convex objective using the exponential mechanism. Our findings indicate that the regularized exponential mechanism can closely match previous empirical and population risk bounds, without requiring smoothness assumptions for algorithms with polynomial running time. Furthermore, by disregarding running time considerations, we show that the exponential mechanism can achieve a good population risk bound and provide a nearly matching lower bound. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Why Is Public Pretraining Necessary for Private Model Training?

Authors: Arun Ganesh, Mahdi Haghifam, Milad Nasr, Sewoong Oh, Thomas Steinke, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta, Lun Wang

Abstract: In the privacy-utility tradeoff of a model trained on benchmark language and vision tasks, remarkable improvements have been widely reported with the use of pretraining on publicly available data. This is in part due to the benefits of transfer learning, which is the standard motivation for pretraining in non-private settings. However, the stark contrast in the improvement achieved through pretrai… ▽ More In the privacy-utility tradeoff of a model trained on benchmark language and vision tasks, remarkable improvements have been widely reported with the use of pretraining on publicly available data. This is in part due to the benefits of transfer learning, which is the standard motivation for pretraining in non-private settings. However, the stark contrast in the improvement achieved through pretraining under privacy compared to non-private settings suggests that there may be a deeper, distinct cause driving these gains. To explain this phenomenon, we hypothesize that the non-convex loss landscape of a model training necessitates an optimization algorithm to go through two phases. In the first, the algorithm needs to select a good "basin" in the loss landscape. In the second, the algorithm solves an easy optimization within that basin. The former is a harder problem to solve with private data, while the latter is harder to solve with public data due to a distribution shift or data scarcity. Guided by this intuition, we provide theoretical constructions that provably demonstrate the separation between private training with and without public pretraining. Further, systematic experiments on CIFAR10 and LibriSpeech provide supporting evidence for our hypothesis. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Multi-Task Differential Privacy Under Distribution Skew

Authors: Walid Krichene, Prateek Jain, Shuang Song, Mukund Sundararajan, Abhradeep Thakurta, Li Zhang

Abstract: We study the problem of multi-task learning under user-level differential privacy, in which $n$ users contribute data to $m$ tasks, each involving a subset of users. One important aspect of the problem, that can significantly impact quality, is the distribution skew among tasks. Certain tasks may have much fewer data samples than others, making them more susceptible to the noise added for privacy.… ▽ More We study the problem of multi-task learning under user-level differential privacy, in which $n$ users contribute data to $m$ tasks, each involving a subset of users. One important aspect of the problem, that can significantly impact quality, is the distribution skew among tasks. Certain tasks may have much fewer data samples than others, making them more susceptible to the noise added for privacy. It is natural to ask whether algorithms can adapt to this skew to improve the overall utility. We give a systematic analysis of the problem, by studying how to optimally allocate a user's privacy budget among tasks. We propose a generic algorithm, based on an adaptive reweighting of the empirical loss, and show that when there is task distribution skew, this gives a quantifiable improvement of excess empirical risk. Experimental studies on recommendation problems that exhibit a long tail of small tasks, demonstrate that our methods significantly improve utility, achieving the state of the art on two standard benchmarks. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Differentially Private Image Classification from Features

Authors: Harsh Mehta, Walid Krichene, Abhradeep Thakurta, Alexey Kurakin, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Leveraging transfer learning has recently been shown to be an effective strategy for training large models with Differential Privacy (DP). Moreover, somewhat surprisingly, recent works have found that privately training just the last layer of a pre-trained model provides the best utility with DP. While past studies largely rely on algorithms like DP-SGD for training large models, in the specific c… ▽ More Leveraging transfer learning has recently been shown to be an effective strategy for training large models with Differential Privacy (DP). Moreover, somewhat surprisingly, recent works have found that privately training just the last layer of a pre-trained model provides the best utility with DP. While past studies largely rely on algorithms like DP-SGD for training large models, in the specific case of privately learning from features, we observe that computational burden is low enough to allow for more sophisticated optimization schemes, including second-order methods. To that end, we systematically explore the effect of design parameters such as loss function and optimization algorithm. We find that, while commonly used logistic regression performs better than linear regression in the non-private setting, the situation is reversed in the private setting. We find that linear regression is much more effective than logistic regression from both privacy and computational aspects, especially at stricter epsilon values ($ε< 1$). On the optimization side, we also explore using Newton's method, and find that second-order information is quite helpful even with privacy, although the benefit significantly diminishes with stricter privacy guarantees. While both methods use second-order information, least squares is effective at lower epsilons while Newton's method is effective at larger epsilon values. To combine the benefits of both, we propose a novel algorithm called DP-FC, which leverages feature covariance instead of the Hessian of the logistic regression loss and performs well across all $ε$ values we tried. With this, we obtain new SOTA results on ImageNet-1k, CIFAR-100 and CIFAR-10 across all values of $ε$ typically considered. Most remarkably, on ImageNet-1K, we obtain top-1 accuracy of 88\% under (8, $8 * 10^{-7}$)-DP and 84.3\% under (0.1, $8 * 10^{-7}$)-DP. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Multi-Epoch Matrix Factorization Mechanisms for Private Machine Learning

Authors: Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, H. Brendan McMahan, Keith Rush, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We introduce new differentially private (DP) mechanisms for gradient-based machine learning (ML) with multiple passes (epochs) over a dataset, substantially improving the achievable privacy-utility-computation tradeoffs. We formalize the problem of DP mechanisms for adaptive streams with multiple participations and introduce a non-trivial extension of online matrix factorization DP mechanisms to o… ▽ More We introduce new differentially private (DP) mechanisms for gradient-based machine learning (ML) with multiple passes (epochs) over a dataset, substantially improving the achievable privacy-utility-computation tradeoffs. We formalize the problem of DP mechanisms for adaptive streams with multiple participations and introduce a non-trivial extension of online matrix factorization DP mechanisms to our setting. This includes establishing the necessary theory for sensitivity calculations and efficient computation of optimal matrices. For some applications like $>\!\! 10,000$ SGD steps, applying these optimal techniques becomes computationally expensive. We thus design an efficient Fourier-transform-based mechanism with only a minor utility loss. Extensive empirical evaluation on both example-level DP for image classification and user-level DP for language modeling demonstrate substantial improvements over all previous methods, including the widely-used DP-SGD . Though our primary application is to ML, our main DP results are applicable to arbitrary linear queries and hence may have much broader applicability. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2023; v1 submitted 11 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 9 pages main-text, 3 figures. 40 pages with 13 figures total

Fully Adaptive Composition for Gaussian Differential Privacy

Authors: Adam Smith, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We show that Gaussian Differential Privacy, a variant of differential privacy tailored to the analysis of Gaussian noise addition, composes gracefully even in the presence of a fully adaptive analyst. Such an analyst selects mechanisms (to be run on a sensitive data set) and their privacy budgets adaptively, that is, based on the answers from other mechanisms run previously on the same data set. I… ▽ More We show that Gaussian Differential Privacy, a variant of differential privacy tailored to the analysis of Gaussian noise addition, composes gracefully even in the presence of a fully adaptive analyst. Such an analyst selects mechanisms (to be run on a sensitive data set) and their privacy budgets adaptively, that is, based on the answers from other mechanisms run previously on the same data set. In the language of Rogers, Roth, Ullman and Vadhan, this gives a filter for GDP with the same parameters as for nonadaptive composition. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Sample-Efficient Personalization: Modeling User Parameters as Low Rank Plus Sparse Components

Authors: Soumyabrata Pal, Prateek Varshney, Prateek Jain, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta, Gagan Madan, Gaurav Aggarwal, Pradeep Shenoy, Gaurav Srivastava

Abstract: Personalization of machine learning (ML) predictions for individual users/domains/enterprises is critical for practical recommendation systems. Standard personalization approaches involve learning a user/domain specific embedding that is fed into a fixed global model which can be limiting. On the other hand, personalizing/fine-tuning model itself for each user/domain -- a.k.a meta-learning -- has… ▽ More Personalization of machine learning (ML) predictions for individual users/domains/enterprises is critical for practical recommendation systems. Standard personalization approaches involve learning a user/domain specific embedding that is fed into a fixed global model which can be limiting. On the other hand, personalizing/fine-tuning model itself for each user/domain -- a.k.a meta-learning -- has high storage/infrastructure cost. Moreover, rigorous theoretical studies of scalable personalization approaches have been very limited. To address the above issues, we propose a novel meta-learning style approach that models network weights as a sum of low-rank and sparse components. This captures common information from multiple individuals/users together in the low-rank part while sparse part captures user-specific idiosyncrasies. We then study the framework in the linear setting, where the problem reduces to that of estimating the sum of a rank-$r$ and a $k$-column sparse matrix using a small number of linear measurements. We propose a computationally efficient alternating minimization method with iterative hard thresholding -- AMHT-LRS -- to learn the low-rank and sparse part. Theoretically, for the realizable Gaussian data setting, we show that AMHT-LRS solves the problem efficiently with nearly optimal sample complexity. Finally, a significant challenge in personalization is ensuring privacy of each user's sensitive data. We alleviate this problem by proposing a differentially private variant of our method that also is equipped with strong generalization guarantees. △ Less

Submitted 5 September, 2023; v1 submitted 7 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: 104 pages, 7 figures, 2 Tables

Fine-Tuning with Differential Privacy Necessitates an Additional Hyperparameter Search

Authors: Yannis Cattan, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Nicolas Papernot, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Models need to be trained with privacy-preserving learning algorithms to prevent leakage of possibly sensitive information contained in their training data. However, canonical algorithms like differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) do not benefit from model scale in the same way as non-private learning. This manifests itself in the form of unappealing tradeoffs between privacy… ▽ More Models need to be trained with privacy-preserving learning algorithms to prevent leakage of possibly sensitive information contained in their training data. However, canonical algorithms like differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) do not benefit from model scale in the same way as non-private learning. This manifests itself in the form of unappealing tradeoffs between privacy and utility (accuracy) when using DP-SGD on complex tasks. To remediate this tension, a paradigm is emerging: fine-tuning with differential privacy from a model pretrained on public (i.e., non-sensitive) training data. In this work, we identify an oversight of existing approaches for differentially private fine tuning. They do not tailor the fine-tuning approach to the specifics of learning with privacy. Our main result is to show how carefully selecting the layers being fine-tuned in the pretrained neural network allows us to establish new state-of-the-art tradeoffs between privacy and accuracy. For instance, we achieve 77.9% accuracy for $(\varepsilon, δ)=(2, 10^{-5})$ on CIFAR-100 for a model pretrained on ImageNet. Our work calls for additional hyperparameter search to configure the differentially private fine-tuning procedure itself. △ Less

Submitted 5 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Recycling Scraps: Improving Private Learning by Leveraging Intermediate Checkpoints

Authors: Virat Shejwalkar, Arun Ganesh, Rajiv Mathews, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: All state-of-the-art (SOTA) differentially private machine learning (DP ML) methods are iterative in nature, and their privacy analyses allow publicly releasing the intermediate training checkpoints. However, DP ML benchmarks, and even practical deployments, typically use only the final training checkpoint to make predictions. In this work, for the first time, we comprehensively explore various me… ▽ More All state-of-the-art (SOTA) differentially private machine learning (DP ML) methods are iterative in nature, and their privacy analyses allow publicly releasing the intermediate training checkpoints. However, DP ML benchmarks, and even practical deployments, typically use only the final training checkpoint to make predictions. In this work, for the first time, we comprehensively explore various methods that aggregate intermediate checkpoints to improve the utility of DP training. Empirically, we demonstrate that checkpoint aggregations provide significant gains in the prediction accuracy over the existing SOTA for CIFAR10 and StackOverflow datasets, and that these gains get magnified in settings with periodically varying training data distributions. For instance, we improve SOTA StackOverflow accuracies to 22.7% (+0.43% absolute) for $ε=8.2$, and 23.84% (+0.43%) for $ε=18.9$. Theoretically, we show that uniform tail averaging of checkpoints improves the empirical risk minimization bound compared to the last checkpoint of DP-SGD. Lastly, we initiate an exploration into estimating the uncertainty that DP noise adds in the predictions of DP ML models. We prove that, under standard assumptions on the loss function, the sample variance from last few checkpoints provides a good approximation of the variance of the final model of a DP run. Empirically, we show that the last few checkpoints can provide a reasonable lower bound for the variance of a converged DP model. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

(Nearly) Optimal Private Linear Regression via Adaptive Clipping

Authors: Prateek Varshney, Abhradeep Thakurta, Prateek Jain

Abstract: We study the problem of differentially private linear regression where each data point is sampled from a fixed sub-Gaussian style distribution. We propose and analyze a one-pass mini-batch stochastic gradient descent method (DP-AMBSSGD) where points in each iteration are sampled without replacement. Noise is added for DP but the noise standard deviation is estimated online. Compared to existing… ▽ More We study the problem of differentially private linear regression where each data point is sampled from a fixed sub-Gaussian style distribution. We propose and analyze a one-pass mini-batch stochastic gradient descent method (DP-AMBSSGD) where points in each iteration are sampled without replacement. Noise is added for DP but the noise standard deviation is estimated online. Compared to existing $(ε, δ)$-DP techniques which have sub-optimal error bounds, DP-AMBSSGD is able to provide nearly optimal error bounds in terms of key parameters like dimensionality $d$, number of points $N$, and the standard deviation $σ$ of the noise in observations. For example, when the $d$-dimensional covariates are sampled i.i.d. from the normal distribution, then the excess error of DP-AMBSSGD due to privacy is $\frac{σ^2 d}{N}(1+\frac{d}{ε^2 N})$, i.e., the error is meaningful when number of samples $N= Ω(d \log d)$ which is the standard operative regime for linear regression. In contrast, error bounds for existing efficient methods in this setting are: $\mathcal{O}\big(\frac{d^3}{ε^2 N^2}\big)$, even for $σ=0$. That is, for constant $ε$, the existing techniques require $N=Ω(d\sqrt{d})$ to provide a non-trivial result. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2022; v1 submitted 11 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 41 Pages, Accepted in the 35th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT 2022)

Private Matrix Approximation and Geometry of Unitary Orbits

Authors: Oren Mangoubi, Yikai Wu, Satyen Kale, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta, Nisheeth K. Vishnoi

Abstract: Consider the following optimization problem: Given $n \times n$ matrices $A$ and $Λ$, maximize $\langle A, UΛU^*\rangle$ where $U$ varies over the unitary group $\mathrm{U}(n)$. This problem seeks to approximate $A$ by a matrix whose spectrum is the same as $Λ$ and, by setting $Λ$ to be appropriate diagonal matrices, one can recover matrix approximation problems such as PCA and rank-$k$ approximat… ▽ More Consider the following optimization problem: Given $n \times n$ matrices $A$ and $Λ$, maximize $\langle A, UΛU^*\rangle$ where $U$ varies over the unitary group $\mathrm{U}(n)$. This problem seeks to approximate $A$ by a matrix whose spectrum is the same as $Λ$ and, by setting $Λ$ to be appropriate diagonal matrices, one can recover matrix approximation problems such as PCA and rank-$k$ approximation. We study the problem of designing differentially private algorithms for this optimization problem in settings where the matrix $A$ is constructed using users' private data. We give efficient and private algorithms that come with upper and lower bounds on the approximation error. Our results unify and improve upon several prior works on private matrix approximation problems. They rely on extensions of packing/covering number bounds for Grassmannians to unitary orbits which should be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 6 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Journal ref: Proceedings of Thirty Fifth Conference on Learning Theory (COLT), PMLR 178:3547-3588, 2022

When Does Differentially Private Learning Not Suffer in High Dimensions?

Authors: Xuechen Li, Daogao Liu, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Huseyin A. Inan, Janardhan Kulkarni, Yin Tat Lee, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta

Abstract: Large pretrained models can be privately fine-tuned to achieve performance approaching that of non-private models. A common theme in these results is the surprising observation that high-dimensional models can achieve favorable privacy-utility trade-offs. This seemingly contradicts known results on the model-size dependence of differentially private convex learning and raises the following researc… ▽ More Large pretrained models can be privately fine-tuned to achieve performance approaching that of non-private models. A common theme in these results is the surprising observation that high-dimensional models can achieve favorable privacy-utility trade-offs. This seemingly contradicts known results on the model-size dependence of differentially private convex learning and raises the following research question: When does the performance of differentially private learning not degrade with increasing model size? We identify that the magnitudes of gradients projected onto subspaces is a key factor that determines performance. To precisely characterize this for private convex learning, we introduce a condition on the objective that we term \emph{restricted Lipschitz continuity} and derive improved bounds for the excess empirical and population risks that are dimension-independent under additional conditions. We empirically show that in private fine-tuning of large language models, gradients obtained during fine-tuning are mostly controlled by a few principal components. This behavior is similar to conditions under which we obtain dimension-independent bounds in convex settings. Our theoretical and empirical results together provide a possible explanation for recent successes in large-scale private fine-tuning. Code to reproduce our results can be found at \url{https://github.com/lxuechen/private-transformers/tree/main/examples/classification/spectral_analysis}. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2022; v1 submitted 30 June, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 26 pages; v3 includes additional experiments and clarification

Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training Examples

Authors: Matthew Jagielski, Om Thakkar, Florian Tramèr, Daphne Ippolito, Katherine Lee, Nicholas Carlini, Eric Wallace, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot, Chiyuan Zhang

Abstract: Machine learning models exhibit two seemingly contradictory phenomena: training data memorization, and various forms of forgetting. In memorization, models overfit specific training examples and become susceptible to privacy attacks. In forgetting, examples which appeared early in training are forgotten by the end. In this work, we connect these phenomena. We propose a technique to measure to what… ▽ More Machine learning models exhibit two seemingly contradictory phenomena: training data memorization, and various forms of forgetting. In memorization, models overfit specific training examples and become susceptible to privacy attacks. In forgetting, examples which appeared early in training are forgotten by the end. In this work, we connect these phenomena. We propose a technique to measure to what extent models "forget" the specifics of training examples, becoming less susceptible to privacy attacks on examples they have not seen recently. We show that, while non-convex models can memorize data forever in the worst-case, standard image, speech, and language models empirically do forget examples over time. We identify nondeterminism as a potential explanation, showing that deterministically trained models do not forget. Our results suggest that examples seen early when training with extremely large datasets - for instance those examples used to pre-train a model - may observe privacy benefits at the expense of examples seen later. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 30 June, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Appeared at ICLR '23, 22 pages, 12 figures

Large Scale Transfer Learning for Differentially Private Image Classification

Authors: Harsh Mehta, Abhradeep Thakurta, Alexey Kurakin, Ashok Cutkosky

Abstract: Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal framework for training machine learning models with individual example level privacy. In the field of deep learning, Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) has emerged as a popular private training algorithm. Unfortunately, the computational cost of training large-scale models with DP-SGD is substantially higher than non-private trai… ▽ More Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal framework for training machine learning models with individual example level privacy. In the field of deep learning, Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) has emerged as a popular private training algorithm. Unfortunately, the computational cost of training large-scale models with DP-SGD is substantially higher than non-private training. This is further exacerbated by the fact that increasing the number of parameters leads to larger degradation in utility with DP. In this work, we zoom in on the ImageNet dataset and demonstrate that, similar to the non-private case, pre-training over-parameterized models on a large public dataset can lead to substantial gains when the model is finetuned privately. Moreover, by systematically comparing private and non-private models across a range of large batch sizes, we find that similar to non-private setting, choice of optimizer can further improve performance substantially with DP. By using LAMB optimizer with DP-SGD we saw improvement of up to 20$\%$ points (absolute). Finally, we show that finetuning just the last layer for a \emph{single step} in the full batch setting, combined with extremely small-scale (near-zero) initialization leads to both SOTA results of 81.7 $\%$ under a wide privacy budget range of $ε\in [4, 10]$ and $δ$ = $10^{-6}$ while minimizing the computational overhead substantially. △ Less

Submitted 20 May, 2022; v1 submitted 5 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Differentially Private Sampling from Rashomon Sets, and the Universality of Langevin Diffusion for Convex Optimization

Authors: Arun Ganesh, Abhradeep Thakurta, Jalaj Upadhyay

Abstract: In this paper we provide an algorithmic framework based on Langevin diffusion (LD) and its corresponding discretizations that allow us to simultaneously obtain: i) An algorithm for sampling from the exponential mechanism, whose privacy analysis does not depend on convexity and which can be stopped at anytime without compromising privacy, and ii) tight uniform stability guarantees for the exponenti… ▽ More In this paper we provide an algorithmic framework based on Langevin diffusion (LD) and its corresponding discretizations that allow us to simultaneously obtain: i) An algorithm for sampling from the exponential mechanism, whose privacy analysis does not depend on convexity and which can be stopped at anytime without compromising privacy, and ii) tight uniform stability guarantees for the exponential mechanism. As a direct consequence, we obtain optimal excess empirical and population risk guarantees for (strongly) convex losses under both pure and approximate differential privacy (DP). The framework allows us to design a DP uniform sampler from the Rashomon set. Rashomon sets are widely used in interpretable and robust machine learning, understanding variable importance, and characterizing fairness. △ Less

Submitted 28 August, 2023; v1 submitted 4 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: Appeared in COLT 2023. For ease of presentation, some results appear in the previous version of this paper on arXiv (v3) that do not appear in this version, nor are subsumed by results in this version. Please see Section 1.4 for more details

Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive Streams

Authors: Sergey Denisov, Brendan McMahan, Keith Rush, Adam Smith, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta

Abstract: Motivated by recent applications requiring differential privacy over adaptive streams, we investigate the question of optimal instantiations of the matrix mechanism in this setting. We prove fundamental theoretical results on the applicability of matrix factorizations to adaptive streams, and provide a parameter-free fixed-point algorithm for computing optimal factorizations. We instantiate this f… ▽ More Motivated by recent applications requiring differential privacy over adaptive streams, we investigate the question of optimal instantiations of the matrix mechanism in this setting. We prove fundamental theoretical results on the applicability of matrix factorizations to adaptive streams, and provide a parameter-free fixed-point algorithm for computing optimal factorizations. We instantiate this framework with respect to concrete matrices which arise naturally in machine learning, and train user-level differentially private models with the resulting optimal mechanisms, yielding significant improvements in a notable problem in federated learning with user-level differential privacy. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2023; v1 submitted 16 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: 33 pages, 6 figures. Associated code at https://github.com/google-research/federated/tree/master/dp_matrix_factorization

Toward Training at ImageNet Scale with Differential Privacy

Authors: Alexey Kurakin, Shuang Song, Steve Chien, Roxana Geambasu, Andreas Terzis, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) is the de facto standard for training machine learning (ML) models, including neural networks, while ensuring the privacy of individual examples in the training set. Despite a rich literature on how to train ML models with differential privacy, it remains extremely challenging to train real-life, large neural networks with both reasonable accuracy and privacy. We set ou… ▽ More Differential privacy (DP) is the de facto standard for training machine learning (ML) models, including neural networks, while ensuring the privacy of individual examples in the training set. Despite a rich literature on how to train ML models with differential privacy, it remains extremely challenging to train real-life, large neural networks with both reasonable accuracy and privacy. We set out to investigate how to do this, using ImageNet image classification as a poster example of an ML task that is very challenging to resolve accurately with DP right now. This paper shares initial lessons from our effort, in the hope that it will inspire and inform other researchers to explore DP training at scale. We show approaches that help make DP training faster, as well as model types and settings of the training process that tend to work better in the DP setting. Combined, the methods we discuss let us train a Resnet-18 with DP to $47.9\%$ accuracy and privacy parameters $ε= 10, δ= 10^{-6}$. This is a significant improvement over "naive" DP training of ImageNet models, but a far cry from the $75\%$ accuracy that can be obtained by the same network without privacy. The model we use was pretrained on the Places365 data set as a starting point. We share our code at https://github.com/google-research/dp-imagenet, calling for others to build upon this new baseline to further improve DP at scale. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2022; v1 submitted 28 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Comments: 25 pages, 7 figures. Code available at https://github.com/google-research/dp-imagenet

Public Data-Assisted Mirror Descent for Private Model Training

Authors: Ehsan Amid, Arun Ganesh, Rajiv Mathews, Swaroop Ramaswamy, Shuang Song, Thomas Steinke, Vinith M. Suriyakumar, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: In this paper, we revisit the problem of using in-distribution public data to improve the privacy/utility trade-offs for differentially private (DP) model training. (Here, public data refers to auxiliary data sets that have no privacy concerns.) We design a natural variant of DP mirror descent, where the DP gradients of the private/sensitive data act as the linear term, and the loss generated by t… ▽ More In this paper, we revisit the problem of using in-distribution public data to improve the privacy/utility trade-offs for differentially private (DP) model training. (Here, public data refers to auxiliary data sets that have no privacy concerns.) We design a natural variant of DP mirror descent, where the DP gradients of the private/sensitive data act as the linear term, and the loss generated by the public data as the mirror map. We show that, for linear regression with feature vectors drawn from a non-isotropic sub-Gaussian distribution, our algorithm, PDA-DPMD (a variant of mirror descent), provides population risk guarantees that are asymptotically better than the best known guarantees under DP (without having access to public data), when the number of public data samples ($n_{\sf pub}$) is sufficiently large. We further show that our algorithm has natural "noise stability" properties that control the variance due to noise added to ensure DP. We demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm by showing privacy/utility trade-offs on four benchmark datasets (StackOverflow, WikiText-2, CIFAR-10, and EMNIST). We show that our algorithm not only significantly improves over traditional DP-SGD, which does not have access to public data, but to our knowledge is the first to improve over DP-SGD on models that have been pre-trained with public data. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2022; v1 submitted 30 November, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 20 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables

Node-Level Differentially Private Graph Neural Networks

Authors: Ameya Daigavane, Gagan Madan, Aditya Sinha, Abhradeep Guha Thakurta, Gaurav Aggarwal, Prateek Jain

Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a popular technique for modelling graph-structured data and computing node-level representations via aggregation of information from the neighborhood of each node. However, this aggregation implies an increased risk of revealing sensitive information, as a node can participate in the inference for multiple nodes. This implies that standard privacy-preserving machin… ▽ More Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a popular technique for modelling graph-structured data and computing node-level representations via aggregation of information from the neighborhood of each node. However, this aggregation implies an increased risk of revealing sensitive information, as a node can participate in the inference for multiple nodes. This implies that standard privacy-preserving machine learning techniques, such as differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) - which are designed for situations where each data point participates in the inference for one point only - either do not apply, or lead to inaccurate models. In this work, we formally define the problem of learning GNN parameters with node-level privacy, and provide an algorithmic solution with a strong differential privacy guarantee. We employ a careful sensitivity analysis and provide a non-trivial extension of the privacy-by-amplification technique to the GNN setting. An empirical evaluation on standard benchmark datasets demonstrates that our method is indeed able to learn accurate privacy-preserving GNNs which outperform both private and non-private methods that completely ignore graph information. △ Less

Submitted 26 August, 2022; v1 submitted 23 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures

Private Alternating Least Squares: Practical Private Matrix Completion with Tighter Rates

Authors: Steve Chien, Prateek Jain, Walid Krichene, Steffen Rendle, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Li Zhang

Abstract: We study the problem of differentially private (DP) matrix completion under user-level privacy. We design a joint differentially private variant of the popular Alternating-Least-Squares (ALS) method that achieves: i) (nearly) optimal sample complexity for matrix completion (in terms of number of items, users), and ii) the best known privacy/utility trade-off both theoretically, as well as on bench… ▽ More We study the problem of differentially private (DP) matrix completion under user-level privacy. We design a joint differentially private variant of the popular Alternating-Least-Squares (ALS) method that achieves: i) (nearly) optimal sample complexity for matrix completion (in terms of number of items, users), and ii) the best known privacy/utility trade-off both theoretically, as well as on benchmark data sets. In particular, we provide the first global convergence analysis of ALS with noise introduced to ensure DP, and show that, in comparison to the best known alternative (the Private Frank-Wolfe algorithm by Jain et al. (2018)), our error bounds scale significantly better with respect to the number of items and users, which is critical in practical problems. Extensive validation on standard benchmarks demonstrate that the algorithm, in combination with carefully designed sampling procedures, is significantly more accurate than existing techniques, thus promising to be the first practical DP embedding model. △ Less

Submitted 20 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shuffling

Authors: Peter Kairouz, Brendan McMahan, Shuang Song, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta, Zheng Xu

Abstract: We consider training models with differential privacy (DP) using mini-batch gradients. The existing state-of-the-art, Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), requires privacy amplification by sampling or shuffling to obtain the best privacy/accuracy/computation trade-offs. Unfortunately, the precise requirements on exact sampling and shuffling can be hard to obtain in importan… ▽ More We consider training models with differential privacy (DP) using mini-batch gradients. The existing state-of-the-art, Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD), requires privacy amplification by sampling or shuffling to obtain the best privacy/accuracy/computation trade-offs. Unfortunately, the precise requirements on exact sampling and shuffling can be hard to obtain in important practical scenarios, particularly federated learning (FL). We design and analyze a DP variant of Follow-The-Regularized-Leader (DP-FTRL) that compares favorably (both theoretically and empirically) to amplified DP-SGD, while allowing for much more flexible data access patterns. DP-FTRL does not use any form of privacy amplification. The code is available at https://github.com/google-research/federated/tree/master/dp_ftrl and https://github.com/google-research/DP-FTRL . △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2021; v1 submitted 26 February, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learning

Authors: Milad Nasr, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nicolas Papernot, Nicholas Carlini

Abstract: Differentially private (DP) machine learning allows us to train models on private data while limiting data leakage. DP formalizes this data leakage through a cryptographic game, where an adversary must predict if a model was trained on a dataset D, or a dataset D' that differs in just one example.If observing the training algorithm does not meaningfully increase the adversary's odds of successfull… ▽ More Differentially private (DP) machine learning allows us to train models on private data while limiting data leakage. DP formalizes this data leakage through a cryptographic game, where an adversary must predict if a model was trained on a dataset D, or a dataset D' that differs in just one example.If observing the training algorithm does not meaningfully increase the adversary's odds of successfully guessing which dataset the model was trained on, then the algorithm is said to be differentially private. Hence, the purpose of privacy analysis is to upper bound the probability that any adversary could successfully guess which dataset the model was trained on.In our paper, we instantiate this hypothetical adversary in order to establish lower bounds on the probability that this distinguishing game can be won. We use this adversary to evaluate the importance of the adversary capabilities allowed in the privacy analysis of DP training algorithms.For DP-SGD, the most common method for training neural networks with differential privacy, our lower bounds are tight and match the theoretical upper bound. This implies that in order to prove better upper bounds, it will be necessary to make use of additional assumptions. Fortunately, we find that our attacks are significantly weaker when additional (realistic)restrictions are put in place on the adversary's capabilities.Thus, in the practical setting common to many real-world deployments, there is a gap between our lower bounds and the upper bounds provided by the analysis: differential privacy is conservative and adversaries may not be able to leak as much information as suggested by the theoretical bound. △ Less

Submitted 11 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

Is Private Learning Possible with Instance Encoding?

Authors: Nicholas Carlini, Samuel Deng, Sanjam Garg, Somesh Jha, Saeed Mahloujifar, Mohammad Mahmoody, Shuang Song, Abhradeep Thakurta, Florian Tramer

Abstract: A private machine learning algorithm hides as much as possible about its training data while still preserving accuracy. In this work, we study whether a non-private learning algorithm can be made private by relying on an instance-encoding mechanism that modifies the training inputs before feeding them to a normal learner. We formalize both the notion of instance encoding and its privacy by providi… ▽ More A private machine learning algorithm hides as much as possible about its training data while still preserving accuracy. In this work, we study whether a non-private learning algorithm can be made private by relying on an instance-encoding mechanism that modifies the training inputs before feeding them to a normal learner. We formalize both the notion of instance encoding and its privacy by providing two attack models. We first prove impossibility results for achieving a (stronger) model. Next, we demonstrate practical attacks in the second (weaker) attack model on InstaHide, a recent proposal by Huang, Song, Li and Arora [ICML'20] that aims to use instance encoding for privacy. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2021; v1 submitted 10 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Fast Dimension Independent Private AdaGrad on Publicly Estimated Subspaces

Authors: Peter Kairouz, Mónica Ribero, Keith Rush, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We revisit the problem of empirical risk minimziation (ERM) with differential privacy. We show that noisy AdaGrad, given appropriate knowledge and conditions on the subspace from which gradients can be drawn, achieves a regret comparable to traditional AdaGrad plus a well-controlled term due to noise. We show a convergence rate of $O(\text{Tr}(G_T)/T)$, where $G_T$ captures the geometry of the gra… ▽ More We revisit the problem of empirical risk minimziation (ERM) with differential privacy. We show that noisy AdaGrad, given appropriate knowledge and conditions on the subspace from which gradients can be drawn, achieves a regret comparable to traditional AdaGrad plus a well-controlled term due to noise. We show a convergence rate of $O(\text{Tr}(G_T)/T)$, where $G_T$ captures the geometry of the gradient subspace. Since $\text{Tr}(G_T)=O(\sqrt{T})$ we can obtain faster rates for convex and Lipschitz functions, compared to the $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ rate achieved by known versions of noisy (stochastic) gradient descent with comparable noise variance. In particular, we show that if the gradients lie in a known constant rank subspace, and assuming algorithmic access to an envelope which bounds decaying sensitivity, one can achieve faster convergence to an excess empirical risk of $\tilde O(1/εn)$, where $ε$ is the privacy budget and $n$ the number of samples. Letting $p$ be the problem dimension, this result implies that, by running noisy Adagrad, we can bypass the DP-SGD bound $\tilde O(\sqrt{p}/εn)$ in $T=(εn)^{2/(1+2α)}$ iterations, where $α\geq 0$ is a parameter controlling gradient norm decay, instead of the rate achieved by SGD of $T=ε^2n^2$. Our results operate with general convex functions in both constrained and unconstrained minimization. Along the way, we do a perturbation analysis of noisy AdaGrad of independent interest. Our utility guarantee for the private ERM problem follows as a corollary to the regret guarantee of noisy AdaGrad. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2021; v1 submitted 14 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacy

Authors: Nicolas Papernot, Abhradeep Thakurta, Shuang Song, Steve Chien, Úlfar Erlingsson

Abstract: Because learning sometimes involves sensitive data, machine learning algorithms have been extended to offer privacy for training data. In practice, this has been mostly an afterthought, with privacy-preserving models obtained by re-running training with a different optimizer, but using the model architectures that already performed well in a non-privacy-preserving setting. This approach leads to l… ▽ More Because learning sometimes involves sensitive data, machine learning algorithms have been extended to offer privacy for training data. In practice, this has been mostly an afterthought, with privacy-preserving models obtained by re-running training with a different optimizer, but using the model architectures that already performed well in a non-privacy-preserving setting. This approach leads to less than ideal privacy/utility tradeoffs, as we show here. Instead, we propose that model architectures are chosen ab initio explicitly for privacy-preserving training. To provide guarantees under the gold standard of differential privacy, one must bound as strictly as possible how individual training points can possibly affect model updates. In this paper, we are the first to observe that the choice of activation function is central to bounding the sensitivity of privacy-preserving deep learning. We demonstrate analytically and experimentally how a general family of bounded activation functions, the tempered sigmoids, consistently outperform unbounded activation functions like ReLU. Using this paradigm, we achieve new state-of-the-art accuracy on MNIST, FashionMNIST, and CIFAR10 without any modification of the learning procedure fundamentals or differential privacy analysis. △ Less

Submitted 28 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Privacy Amplification via Random Check-Ins

Authors: Borja Balle, Peter Kairouz, H. Brendan McMahan, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) forms a fundamental building block in many applications for learning over sensitive data. Two standard approaches, privacy amplification by subsampling, and privacy amplification by shuffling, permit adding lower noise in DP-SGD than via naïve schemes. A key assumption in both these approaches is that the elements in the data set can be u… ▽ More Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) forms a fundamental building block in many applications for learning over sensitive data. Two standard approaches, privacy amplification by subsampling, and privacy amplification by shuffling, permit adding lower noise in DP-SGD than via naïve schemes. A key assumption in both these approaches is that the elements in the data set can be uniformly sampled, or be uniformly permuted -- constraints that may become prohibitive when the data is processed in a decentralized or distributed fashion. In this paper, we focus on conducting iterative methods like DP-SGD in the setting of federated learning (FL) wherein the data is distributed among many devices (clients). Our main contribution is the \emph{random check-in} distributed protocol, which crucially relies only on randomized participation decisions made locally and independently by each client. It has privacy/accuracy trade-offs similar to privacy amplification by subsampling/shuffling. However, our method does not require server-initiated communication, or even knowledge of the population size. To our knowledge, this is the first privacy amplification tailored for a distributed learning framework, and it may have broader applicability beyond FL. Along the way, we extend privacy amplification by shuffling to incorporate $(ε,δ)$-DP local randomizers, and exponentially improve its guarantees. In practical regimes, this improvement allows for similar privacy and utility using data from an order of magnitude fewer users. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2020; v1 submitted 13 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Updated proof for $(ε_0, δ_0)$-DP local randomizers

Evading Curse of Dimensionality in Unconstrained Private GLMs via Private Gradient Descent

Authors: Shuang Song, Thomas Steinke, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We revisit the well-studied problem of differentially private empirical risk minimization (ERM). We show that for unconstrained convex generalized linear models (GLMs), one can obtain an excess empirical risk of $\tilde O\left(\sqrt{\texttt{rank}}/εn\right)$, where ${\texttt{rank}}$ is the rank of the feature matrix in the GLM problem, $n$ is the number of data samples, and $ε$ is the privacy para… ▽ More We revisit the well-studied problem of differentially private empirical risk minimization (ERM). We show that for unconstrained convex generalized linear models (GLMs), one can obtain an excess empirical risk of $\tilde O\left(\sqrt{\texttt{rank}}/εn\right)$, where ${\texttt{rank}}$ is the rank of the feature matrix in the GLM problem, $n$ is the number of data samples, and $ε$ is the privacy parameter. This bound is attained via differentially private gradient descent (DP-GD). Furthermore, via the first lower bound for unconstrained private ERM, we show that our upper bound is tight. In sharp contrast to the constrained ERM setting, there is no dependence on the dimensionality of the ambient model space ($p$). (Notice that ${\texttt{rank}}\leq \min\{n, p\}$.) Besides, we obtain an analogous excess population risk bound which depends on ${\texttt{rank}}$ instead of $p$. For the smooth non-convex GLM setting (i.e., where the objective function is non-convex but preserves the GLM structure), we further show that DP-GD attains a dimension-independent convergence of $\tilde O\left(\sqrt{\texttt{rank}}/εn\right)$ to a first-order-stationary-point of the underlying objective. Finally, we show that for convex GLMs, a variant of DP-GD commonly used in practice (which involves clipping the individual gradients) also exhibits the same dimension-independent convergence to the minimum of a well-defined objective. To that end, we provide a structural lemma that characterizes the effect of clipping on the optimization profile of DP-GD. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2021; v1 submitted 11 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

A Separation Result Between Data-oblivious and Data-aware Poisoning Attacks

Authors: Samuel Deng, Sanjam Garg, Somesh Jha, Saeed Mahloujifar, Mohammad Mahmoody, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Poisoning attacks have emerged as a significant security threat to machine learning algorithms. It has been demonstrated that adversaries who make small changes to the training set, such as adding specially crafted data points, can hurt the performance of the output model. Some of the stronger poisoning attacks require the full knowledge of the training data. This leaves open the possibility of ac… ▽ More Poisoning attacks have emerged as a significant security threat to machine learning algorithms. It has been demonstrated that adversaries who make small changes to the training set, such as adding specially crafted data points, can hurt the performance of the output model. Some of the stronger poisoning attacks require the full knowledge of the training data. This leaves open the possibility of achieving the same attack results using poisoning attacks that do not have the full knowledge of the clean training set. In this work, we initiate a theoretical study of the problem above. Specifically, for the case of feature selection with LASSO, we show that full-information adversaries (that craft poisoning examples based on the rest of the training data) are provably stronger than the optimal attacker that is oblivious to the training set yet has access to the distribution of the data. Our separation result shows that the two setting of data-aware and data-oblivious are fundamentally different and we cannot hope to always achieve the same attack or defense results in these scenarios. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2021; v1 submitted 26 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Guidelines for Implementing and Auditing Differentially Private Systems

Authors: Daniel Kifer, Solomon Messing, Aaron Roth, Abhradeep Thakurta, Danfeng Zhang

Abstract: Differential privacy is an information theoretic constraint on algorithms and code. It provides quantification of privacy leakage and formal privacy guarantees that are currently considered the gold standard in privacy protections. In this paper we provide an initial set of "best practices" for developing differentially private platforms, techniques for unit testing that are specific to differenti… ▽ More Differential privacy is an information theoretic constraint on algorithms and code. It provides quantification of privacy leakage and formal privacy guarantees that are currently considered the gold standard in privacy protections. In this paper we provide an initial set of "best practices" for developing differentially private platforms, techniques for unit testing that are specific to differential privacy, guidelines for checking if differential privacy is being applied correctly in an application, and recommendations for parameter settings. The genesis of this paper was an initiative by Facebook and Social Science One to provide social science researchers with programmatic access to a URL-shares dataset. In order to maximize the utility of the data for research while protecting privacy, researchers should access the data through an interactive platform that supports differential privacy. The intention of this paper is to provide guidelines and recommendations that can generally be re-used in a wide variety of systems. For this reason, no specific platforms will be named, except for systems whose details and theory appear in academic papers. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2020; v1 submitted 10 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Encode, Shuffle, Analyze Privacy Revisited: Formalizations and Empirical Evaluation

Authors: Úlfar Erlingsson, Vitaly Feldman, Ilya Mironov, Ananth Raghunathan, Shuang Song, Kunal Talwar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Recently, a number of approaches and techniques have been introduced for reporting software statistics with strong privacy guarantees. These range from abstract algorithms to comprehensive systems with varying assumptions and built upon local differential privacy mechanisms and anonymity. Based on the Encode-Shuffle-Analyze (ESA) framework, notable results formally clarified large improvements in… ▽ More Recently, a number of approaches and techniques have been introduced for reporting software statistics with strong privacy guarantees. These range from abstract algorithms to comprehensive systems with varying assumptions and built upon local differential privacy mechanisms and anonymity. Based on the Encode-Shuffle-Analyze (ESA) framework, notable results formally clarified large improvements in privacy guarantees without loss of utility by making reports anonymous. However, these results either comprise of systems with seemingly disparate mechanisms and attack models, or formal statements with little guidance to practitioners. Addressing this, we provide a formal treatment and offer prescriptive guidelines for privacy-preserving reporting with anonymity. We revisit the ESA framework with a simple, abstract model of attackers as well as assumptions covering it and other proposed systems of anonymity. In light of new formal privacy bounds, we examine the limitations of sketch-based encodings and ESA mechanisms such as data-dependent crowds. We also demonstrate how the ESA notion of fragmentation (reporting data aspects in separate, unlinkable messages) improves privacy/utility tradeoffs both in terms of local and central differential-privacy guarantees. Finally, to help practitioners understand the applicability and limitations of privacy-preserving reporting, we report on a large number of empirical experiments. We use real-world datasets with heavy-tailed or near-flat distributions, which pose the greatest difficulty for our techniques; in particular, we focus on data drawn from images that can be easily visualized in a way that highlights reconstruction errors. Showing the promise of the approach, and of independent interest, we also report on experiments using anonymous, privacy-preserving reporting to train high-accuracy deep neural networks on standard tasks---MNIST and CIFAR-10. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Rates

Authors: Raef Bassily, Vitaly Feldman, Kunal Talwar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We study differentially private (DP) algorithms for stochastic convex optimization (SCO). In this problem the goal is to approximately minimize the population loss given i.i.d. samples from a distribution over convex and Lipschitz loss functions. A long line of existing work on private convex optimization focuses on the empirical loss and derives asymptotically tight bounds on the excess empirical… ▽ More We study differentially private (DP) algorithms for stochastic convex optimization (SCO). In this problem the goal is to approximately minimize the population loss given i.i.d. samples from a distribution over convex and Lipschitz loss functions. A long line of existing work on private convex optimization focuses on the empirical loss and derives asymptotically tight bounds on the excess empirical loss. However a significant gap exists in the known bounds for the population loss. We show that, up to logarithmic factors, the optimal excess population loss for DP algorithms is equal to the larger of the optimal non-private excess population loss, and the optimal excess empirical loss of DP algorithms. This implies that, contrary to intuition based on private ERM, private SCO has asymptotically the same rate of $1/\sqrt{n}$ as non-private SCO in the parameter regime most common in practice. The best previous result in this setting gives rate of $1/n^{1/4}$. Our approach builds on existing differentially private algorithms and relies on the analysis of algorithmic stability to ensure generalization. △ Less

Submitted 26 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymity

Authors: Úlfar Erlingsson, Vitaly Feldman, Ilya Mironov, Ananth Raghunathan, Kunal Talwar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Sensitive statistics are often collected across sets of users, with repeated collection of reports done over time. For example, trends in users' private preferences or software usage may be monitored via such reports. We study the collection of such statistics in the local differential privacy (LDP) model, and describe an algorithm whose privacy cost is polylogarithmic in the number of changes to… ▽ More Sensitive statistics are often collected across sets of users, with repeated collection of reports done over time. For example, trends in users' private preferences or software usage may be monitored via such reports. We study the collection of such statistics in the local differential privacy (LDP) model, and describe an algorithm whose privacy cost is polylogarithmic in the number of changes to a user's value. More fundamentally---by building on anonymity of the users' reports---we also demonstrate how the privacy cost of our LDP algorithm can actually be much lower when viewed in the central model of differential privacy. We show, via a new and general privacy amplification technique, that any permutation-invariant algorithm satisfying $\varepsilon$-local differential privacy will satisfy $(O(\varepsilon \sqrt{\log(1/δ)/n}), δ)$-central differential privacy. By this, we explain how the high noise and $\sqrt{n}$ overhead of LDP protocols is a consequence of them being significantly more private in the central model. As a practical corollary, our results imply that several LDP-based industrial deployments may have much lower privacy cost than their advertised $\varepsilon$ would indicate---at least if reports are anonymized. △ Less

Submitted 25 July, 2020; v1 submitted 29 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Comments: Stated amplification bounds for epsilon > 1 explicitly and also stated the bounds for for Renyi DP. Fixed an incorrect statement in one of the proofs

Privacy Amplification by Iteration

Authors: Vitaly Feldman, Ilya Mironov, Kunal Talwar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: Many commonly used learning algorithms work by iteratively updating an intermediate solution using one or a few data points in each iteration. Analysis of differential privacy for such algorithms often involves ensuring privacy of each step and then reasoning about the cumulative privacy cost of the algorithm. This is enabled by composition theorems for differential privacy that allow releasing of… ▽ More Many commonly used learning algorithms work by iteratively updating an intermediate solution using one or a few data points in each iteration. Analysis of differential privacy for such algorithms often involves ensuring privacy of each step and then reasoning about the cumulative privacy cost of the algorithm. This is enabled by composition theorems for differential privacy that allow releasing of all the intermediate results. In this work, we demonstrate that for contractive iterations, not releasing the intermediate results strongly amplifies the privacy guarantees. We describe several applications of this new analysis technique to solving convex optimization problems via noisy stochastic gradient descent. For example, we demonstrate that a relatively small number of non-private data points from the same distribution can be used to close the gap between private and non-private convex optimization. In addition, we demonstrate that we can achieve guarantees similar to those obtainable using the privacy-amplification-by-sampling technique in several natural settings where that technique cannot be applied. △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2018; v1 submitted 20 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comments: Extended abstract appears in Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) 2018

Model-Agnostic Private Learning via Stability

Authors: Raef Bassily, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We design differentially private learning algorithms that are agnostic to the learning model. Our algorithms are interactive in nature, i.e., instead of outputting a model based on the training data, they provide predictions for a set of $m$ feature vectors that arrive online. We show that, for the feature vectors on which an ensemble of models (trained on random disjoint subsets of a dataset) mak… ▽ More We design differentially private learning algorithms that are agnostic to the learning model. Our algorithms are interactive in nature, i.e., instead of outputting a model based on the training data, they provide predictions for a set of $m$ feature vectors that arrive online. We show that, for the feature vectors on which an ensemble of models (trained on random disjoint subsets of a dataset) makes consistent predictions, there is almost no-cost of privacy in generating accurate predictions for those feature vectors. To that end, we provide a novel coupling of the distance to instability framework with the sparse vector technique. We provide algorithms with formal privacy and utility guarantees for both binary/multi-class classification, and soft-label classification. For binary classification in the standard (agnostic) PAC model, we show how to bootstrap from our privately generated predictions to construct a computationally efficient private learner that outputs a final accurate hypothesis. Our construction - to the best of our knowledge - is the first computationally efficient construction for a label-private learner. We prove sample complexity upper bounds for this setting. As in non-private sample complexity bounds, the only relevant property of the given concept class is its VC dimension. For soft-label classification, our techniques are based on exploiting the stability properties of traditional learning algorithms, like stochastic gradient descent (SGD). We provide a new technique to boost the average-case stability properties of learning algorithms to strong (worst-case) stability properties, and then exploit them to obtain private classification algorithms. In the process, we also show that a large class of SGD methods satisfy average-case stability properties, in contrast to a smaller class of SGD methods that are uniformly stable as shown in prior work. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Differentially Private Matrix Completion Revisited

Authors: Prateek Jain, Om Thakkar, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We provide the first provably joint differentially private algorithm with formal utility guarantees for the problem of user-level privacy-preserving collaborative filtering. Our algorithm is based on the Frank-Wolfe method, and it consistently estimates the underlying preference matrix as long as the number of users $m$ is $ω(n^{5/4})$, where $n$ is the number of items, and each user provides her… ▽ More We provide the first provably joint differentially private algorithm with formal utility guarantees for the problem of user-level privacy-preserving collaborative filtering. Our algorithm is based on the Frank-Wolfe method, and it consistently estimates the underlying preference matrix as long as the number of users $m$ is $ω(n^{5/4})$, where $n$ is the number of items, and each user provides her preference for at least $\sqrt{n}$ randomly selected items. Along the way, we provide an optimal differentially private algorithm for singular vector computation, based on the celebrated Oja's method, that provides significant savings in terms of space and time while operating on sparse matrices. We also empirically evaluate our algorithm on a suite of datasets, and show that it consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art private algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 11 June, 2018; v1 submitted 28 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Comments: Updated version. Accepted for presentation at International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) 2018

Practical Locally Private Heavy Hitters

Authors: Raef Bassily, Kobbi Nissim, Uri Stemmer, Abhradeep Thakurta

Abstract: We present new practical local differentially private heavy hitters algorithms achieving optimal or near-optimal worst-case error and running time -- TreeHist and Bitstogram. In both algorithms, server running time is $\tilde O(n)$ and user running time is $\tilde O(1)$, hence improving on the prior state-of-the-art result of Bassily and Smith [STOC 2015] requiring $O(n^{5/2})$ server time and… ▽ More We present new practical local differentially private heavy hitters algorithms achieving optimal or near-optimal worst-case error and running time -- TreeHist and Bitstogram. In both algorithms, server running time is $\tilde O(n)$ and user running time is $\tilde O(1)$, hence improving on the prior state-of-the-art result of Bassily and Smith [STOC 2015] requiring $O(n^{5/2})$ server time and $O(n^{3/2})$ user time. With a typically large number of participants in local algorithms ($n$ in the millions), this reduction in time complexity, in particular at the user side, is crucial for making locally private heavy hitters algorithms usable in practice. We implemented Algorithm TreeHist to verify our theoretical analysis and compared its performance with the performance of Google's RAPPOR code. △ Less

Submitted 16 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Erasure-Resilient Property Testing

Authors: Kashyap Dixit, Sofya Raskhodnikova, Abhradeep Thakurta, Nithin Varma

Abstract: Property testers form an important class of sublinear algorithms. In the standard property testing model, an algorithm accesses the input function via an oracle that returns function values at all queried domain points. In many realistic situations, the oracle may be unable to reveal the function values at some domain points due to privacy concerns, or when some of the values get erased by mistake… ▽ More Property testers form an important class of sublinear algorithms. In the standard property testing model, an algorithm accesses the input function via an oracle that returns function values at all queried domain points. In many realistic situations, the oracle may be unable to reveal the function values at some domain points due to privacy concerns, or when some of the values get erased by mistake or by an adversary. We initiate a study of property testers that are resilient to the presence of adversarially erased function values. An alpha-erasure-resilient epsilon-tester for a property P is given parameters alpha, epsilon in (0,1), along with oracle access to a function f such that at most an alpha fraction of the function values have been erased. The tester does not know whether a point is erased unless it queries that point. The tester has to accept with high probability if there is a way to assign values to the erased points such that the resulting function satisfies P. It has to reject with high probability if, for all assignments of values to the erased points, the resulting function has to be changed in at least an epsilon-fraction of the nonerased domain points to satisfy P. We design erasure-resilient property testers for a large class of properties. For some properties, it is possible to obtain erasure-resilient testers by using standard testers as a black box. But there are more challenging properties for which all known testers rely on querying a specific point. If this point is erased, all these testers break. We give efficient erasure-resilient testers for several classes of such properties including monotonicity, the Lipschitz property, and convexity. Finally, we describe a property that can be epsilon-tested with O(1/epsilon) queries in the standard model, whereas testing it in the erasure-resilient model requires number of queries polynomial in the input size. △ Less

Submitted 19 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

MSC Class: 68W20; 68W25; 68P10; 68Q87; 68W40 ACM Class: F.2.2

To Drop or Not to Drop: Robustness, Consistency and Differential Privacy Properties of Dropout

Authors: Prateek Jain, Vivek Kulkarni, Abhradeep Thakurta, Oliver Williams

Abstract: Training deep belief networks (DBNs) requires optimizing a non-convex function with an extremely large number of parameters. Naturally, existing gradient descent (GD) based methods are prone to arbitrarily poor local minima. In this paper, we rigorously show that such local minima can be avoided (upto an approximation error) by using the dropout technique, a widely used heuristic in this domain. I… ▽ More Training deep belief networks (DBNs) requires optimizing a non-convex function with an extremely large number of parameters. Naturally, existing gradient descent (GD) based methods are prone to arbitrarily poor local minima. In this paper, we rigorously show that such local minima can be avoided (upto an approximation error) by using the dropout technique, a widely used heuristic in this domain. In particular, we show that by randomly dropping a few nodes of a one-hidden layer neural network, the training objective function, up to a certain approximation error, decreases by a multiplicative factor. On the flip side, we show that for training convex empirical risk minimizers (ERM), dropout in fact acts as a "stabilizer" or regularizer. That is, a simple dropout based GD method for convex ERMs is stable in the face of arbitrary changes to any one of the training points. Using the above assertion, we show that dropout provides fast rates for generalization error in learning (convex) generalized linear models (GLM). Moreover, using the above mentioned stability properties of dropout, we design dropout based differentially private algorithms for solving ERMs. The learned GLM thus, preserves privacy of each of the individual training points while providing accurate predictions for new test points. Finally, we empirically validate our stability assertions for dropout in the context of convex ERMs and show that surprisingly, dropout significantly outperforms (in terms of prediction accuracy) the L2 regularization based methods for several benchmark datasets. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Comments: Currently under review for ICML 2015