ZTD$_{JAVA}$: Mitigating Software Supply Chain Vulnerabilities via Zero-Trust Dependencies
Authors:
Paschal C. Amusuo,
Kyle A. Robinson,
Tanmay Singla,
Huiyun Peng,
Aravind Machiry,
Santiago Torres-Arias,
Laurent Simon,
James C. Davis
Abstract:
Third-party software components like Log4J accelerate software application development but introduce substantial risk. These components have led to many software supply chain attacks. These attacks succeed because third-party software components are implicitly trusted in an application. Although several security defenses exist to reduce the risks from third-party software components, none of them…
▽ More
Third-party software components like Log4J accelerate software application development but introduce substantial risk. These components have led to many software supply chain attacks. These attacks succeed because third-party software components are implicitly trusted in an application. Although several security defenses exist to reduce the risks from third-party software components, none of them fulfills the full set of requirements needed to defend against common attacks. No individual solution prevents malicious access to operating system resources, is dependency-aware, and enables the discovery of least privileges, all with low runtime costs. Consequently, they cannot prevent software supply chain attacks.
This paper proposes applying the NIST Zero Trust Architecture to software applications. Our Zero Trust Dependencies concept applies the NIST ZTA principles to an application's dependencies. First, we assess the expected effectiveness and feasibility of Zero Trust Dependencies using a study of third-party software components and their vulnerabilities. Then, we present a system design, ZTDSYS, that enables the application of Zero Trust Dependencies to software applications and a prototype, ZTDJAVA, for Java applications. Finally, with evaluations on recreated vulnerabilities and realistic applications, we show that ZTDJAVA can defend against prevalent vulnerability classes, introduces negligible cost, and is easy to configure and use.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024; v1 submitted 21 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
An Empirical Study on Using Large Language Models to Analyze Software Supply Chain Security Failures
Authors:
Tanmay Singla,
Dharun Anandayuvaraj,
Kelechi G. Kalu,
Taylor R. Schorlemmer,
James C. Davis
Abstract:
As we increasingly depend on software systems, the consequences of breaches in the software supply chain become more severe. High-profile cyber attacks like those on SolarWinds and ShadowHammer have resulted in significant financial and data losses, underlining the need for stronger cybersecurity. One way to prevent future breaches is by studying past failures. However, traditional methods of anal…
▽ More
As we increasingly depend on software systems, the consequences of breaches in the software supply chain become more severe. High-profile cyber attacks like those on SolarWinds and ShadowHammer have resulted in significant financial and data losses, underlining the need for stronger cybersecurity. One way to prevent future breaches is by studying past failures. However, traditional methods of analyzing these failures require manually reading and summarizing reports about them. Automated support could reduce costs and allow analysis of more failures. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques such as Large Language Models (LLMs) could be leveraged to assist the analysis of failures. In this study, we assessed the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to analyze historical software supply chain breaches. We used LLMs to replicate the manual analysis of 69 software supply chain security failures performed by members of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). We developed prompts for LLMs to categorize these by four dimensions: type of compromise, intent, nature, and impact. GPT 3.5s categorizations had an average accuracy of 68% and Bard had an accuracy of 58% over these dimensions. We report that LLMs effectively characterize software supply chain failures when the source articles are detailed enough for consensus among manual analysts, but cannot yet replace human analysts. Future work can improve LLM performance in this context, and study a broader range of articles and failures.
△ Less
Submitted 9 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
