-
ZTD$_{JAVA}$: Mitigating Software Supply Chain Vulnerabilities via Zero-Trust Dependencies
Authors:
Paschal C. Amusuo,
Kyle A. Robinson,
Tanmay Singla,
Huiyun Peng,
Aravind Machiry,
Santiago Torres-Arias,
Laurent Simon,
James C. Davis
Abstract:
Third-party software components like Log4J accelerate software application development but introduce substantial risk. These components have led to many software supply chain attacks. These attacks succeed because third-party software components are implicitly trusted in an application. Although several security defenses exist to reduce the risks from third-party software components, none of them…
▽ More
Third-party software components like Log4J accelerate software application development but introduce substantial risk. These components have led to many software supply chain attacks. These attacks succeed because third-party software components are implicitly trusted in an application. Although several security defenses exist to reduce the risks from third-party software components, none of them fulfills the full set of requirements needed to defend against common attacks. No individual solution prevents malicious access to operating system resources, is dependency-aware, and enables the discovery of least privileges, all with low runtime costs. Consequently, they cannot prevent software supply chain attacks.
This paper proposes applying the NIST Zero Trust Architecture to software applications. Our Zero Trust Dependencies concept applies the NIST ZTA principles to an application's dependencies. First, we assess the expected effectiveness and feasibility of Zero Trust Dependencies using a study of third-party software components and their vulnerabilities. Then, we present a system design, ZTDSYS, that enables the application of Zero Trust Dependencies to software applications and a prototype, ZTDJAVA, for Java applications. Finally, with evaluations on recreated vulnerabilities and realistic applications, we show that ZTDJAVA can defend against prevalent vulnerability classes, introduces negligible cost, and is easy to configure and use.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024; v1 submitted 21 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Systematically Detecting Packet Validation Vulnerabilities in Embedded Network Stacks
Authors:
Paschal C. Amusuo,
Ricardo Andrés Calvo Méndez,
Zhongwei Xu,
Aravind Machiry,
James C. Davis
Abstract:
Embedded Network Stacks (ENS) enable low-resource devices to communicate with the outside world, facilitating the development of the Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. Some defects in ENS are thus high-severity cybersecurity vulnerabilities: they are remotely triggerable and can impact the physical world. While prior research has shed light on the characteristics of defects in many cla…
▽ More
Embedded Network Stacks (ENS) enable low-resource devices to communicate with the outside world, facilitating the development of the Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems. Some defects in ENS are thus high-severity cybersecurity vulnerabilities: they are remotely triggerable and can impact the physical world. While prior research has shed light on the characteristics of defects in many classes of software systems, no study has described the properties of ENS defects nor identified a systematic technique to expose them. The most common automated approach to detecting ENS defects is feedback-driven randomized dynamic analysis ("fuzzing"), a costly and unpredictable technique.
This paper provides the first systematic characterization of cybersecurity vulnerabilities in ENS. We analyzed 61 vulnerabilities across 6 open-source ENS. Most of these ENS defects are concentrated in the transport and network layers of the network stack, require reaching different states in the network protocol, and can be triggered by only 1-2 modifications to a single packet. We therefore propose a novel systematic testing framework that focuses on the transport and network layers, uses seeds that cover a network protocol's states, and systematically modifies packet fields. We evaluated this framework on 4 ENS and replicated 12 of the 14 reported IP/TCP/UDP vulnerabilities. On recent versions of these ENSs, it discovered 7 novel defects (6 assigned CVES) during a bounded systematic test that covered all protocol states and made up to 3 modifications per packet. We found defects in 3 of the 4 ENS we tested that had not been found by prior fuzzing research. Our results suggest that fuzzing should be deferred until after systematic testing is employed.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Reflections on Software Failure Analysis
Authors:
Paschal C. Amusuo,
Aishwarya Sharma,
Siddharth R. Rao,
Abbey Vincent,
James C. Davis
Abstract:
Failure studies are important in revealing the root causes, behaviors, and life cycle of defects in software systems. These studies either focus on understanding the characteristics of defects in specific classes of systems or the characteristics of a specific type of defect in the systems it manifests in. Failure studies have influenced various software engineering research directions, especially…
▽ More
Failure studies are important in revealing the root causes, behaviors, and life cycle of defects in software systems. These studies either focus on understanding the characteristics of defects in specific classes of systems or the characteristics of a specific type of defect in the systems it manifests in. Failure studies have influenced various software engineering research directions, especially in the area of software evolution, defect detection, and program repair.
In this paper, we reflect on the conduct of failure studies in software engineering. We reviewed a sample of 52 failure study papers. We identified several recurring problems in these studies, some of which hinder the ability of the engineering community to trust or replicate the results. Based on our findings, we suggest future research directions, including identifying and analyzing failure causal chains, standardizing the conduct of failure studies, and tool support for faster defect analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2022; v1 submitted 7 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
