Mail Thread Index

  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] lock-in, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] lock-in, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] lock-in, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Please explain to my clients...., Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] Administrivia, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] The Hooker Flap (was: URGENT silliness), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] scope and TLDs (was: proprietary), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Delegation models (was: proprietary TLDs), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Nomination Procedures for the Chair of the General Assembly (GA), DNSO Listadmin
  • Re: [wg-c] lock-in and Delegation models, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Ken Stubbs, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Some nagging questions not on the WG-C agenda, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Re: Proprietary TLDs (was: scope and TLDs), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] FW: Re: [IFWP] Esther Dyson's reply, William X. Walsh
  • [wg-c] Creation of the .ps domain, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • [wg-c] .EU domain?, Attyross
  • Re: [wg-c] Are cc:TLDs included in our Charter?, John Charles Broomfield
  • [wg-c] Re: Are cc:TLDs included in our Charter?, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] bounced message, forwarded for Ken Stubbs, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, dwmaher
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Craig Simon
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Joseph Friedman
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Richard Lindsay
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, katie
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Kilnam Chon
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Michael D. Palage
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Ann-Catherine Andersson
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Hal Lubsen
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Siegfried Langenbach
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Harold Feld
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] The consensus call.., Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Timothy Denton
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Andrew Lutts
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Paul Stahura
  • Message not available
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Dongman Lee
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, pg
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Penman, Ian
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Cohen, Tod
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Cohen, Tod
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Olivier Kozlowski
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Attyross
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Chicoine, Caroline
  • [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, john.c.lewis
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Annie Renard
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Elisabeth Porteneuve
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Anthony Lupo
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Jean-Michel Becar
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Rita M. Odin
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Younjung Park
  • AW: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Broich, Astrid
  • [wg-c] Consensus Vote, WICG
  • VB: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Petter Rindforth
  • [wg-c] Consensus call, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus call, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus call, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus call, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus call, Alex Kamantauskas
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus call, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus call, Simon Higgs
  • History rewriting (Re: [wg-c] Consensus call), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus call, Simon Higgs
  • RE: [wg-c] Consensus call, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] The Vote, BEARSEVEN
  • [wg-c] Early case under new cybersquat law, Attyross
  • Re: [wg-c] ballot stuffing, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] Are cc:TLDs included in our Charter?, Elisabeth Porteneuve
  • [wg-c] Try one first, Attyross
  • [wg-c] bounced message, for Ken Stubbs, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (11/12), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Initial Numbers, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Initial Numbers, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Initial Numbers, Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] Consensus vote - "no" on procedural grounds, bob broxton
  • Re: [wg-c] Consensus vote - "no" on procedural grounds, Dave Crocker
  • [wg-c] The Broxton Cypher (Sunday Comics), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Eva Frölich , Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [registrars] Clarification on Working Group C Vote; [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] re: wg-c consensus call, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] A question about .INT, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Re: A question about .INT, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Re: A question about .INT (Fwd for Mike StJohns), Eric Brunner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] Re: A question about .INT (Fwd for Mike StJohns), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Unique DNS Root Last Call (DNSIND WG), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] reposted for Brian Carpenter, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Tonight's teleconference., Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] Administrativia, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Consensus "elsewhere"..., Ross Wm. Rader
  • [wg-c] RE: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Eva Frölich, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] three votes sent to me that may not have gone to the entire list, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Resend: Some nagging questions not on the WG-C agenda, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Register.com auto-reg's TMs in all domains, ICANN a customer, Mark C. Langston
  • [wg-c] Adding (just under) a Million TLDs to the DNS Root, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Re: Adding (just under) a Million TLDs to the DNS Root (Fwd for Paul Vixie), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] reposted for Paul Vixie, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] reposted for Paul Mockapetris, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] factoid, Kent Crispin
  • [wg-c] On reaching consensus, and the purpose of the testbed, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] scheduling note, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Change that AT&T vote to "yes", Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] Cyberlaw Course, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
  • [wg-c] Re: VOTE, Eva Frölich
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (Voting closes today), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root, DNSO Listadmin
  • Re: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root, Dave Crocker
  • [wg-c] [council] Working Group C Co-Chair, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] To the Abstainers, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Consensus Vote - yes, Kilnam Chon
  • [wg-c] Chicken. Egg. Theory. Reality., WICG
  • [wg-c] repeat post, Mark Measday
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (pentultimate), Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root, Karl Auerbach
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (final), Eric Brunner
  • RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] consensus call results, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] consensus call results, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] consensus call results, A.M. Rutkowski
  • [wg-c] consensus call results, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] thanks, Jonathan Weinberg
  • RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] IAB comment, Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] Re: IAB comment, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Paul Garrin
  • RE: [wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • Re: [wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] One summary of NO voting rationals offered, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] bounced, reposted for Paul Garrin, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] .EU news, Attyross
  • Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ), Mark C. Langston
  • RE: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ), Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ), Mark C. Langston
  • RE: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ), Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ), Karl Auerbach
  • [wg-c] Re: Suggestions, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: Suggestions, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: Suggestions, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Karl Auerbach
  • [wg-c] Specific TLD Proposals, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Dave Crocker
  • RE: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week, Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] Consensus, Kent Crispin
  • [wg-c] Re: One summary of NO voting rationals [PPC and Rita's], Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Re: One summary of NO voting rationals [Philip Sheppard's], Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] reposted for Tony Rutkowski, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] reposted for Paul Garrin, Jonathan Weinberg
  • RE: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ), Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO
  • [wg-c] chartered tlds, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] Multiple Root Distractions, Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] Re: Suggestions, martys
  • [wg-c] reposted for Richard S. Campbell, Jonathan Weinberg
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • FW: [wg-c] reposted for Richard S. Campbell, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] scheduling note, redux, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] new TLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs), J. William Semich
  • Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs), John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs), A.M. Rutkowski
  • Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs), Dave Crocker
  • Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs), J. William Semich
  • [wg-c] I lost count, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, J. William Semich
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Ross Wm. Rader
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Harold Feld
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Mark C. Langston
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] New TLDs, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Paul Garrin
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Richard
  • [wg-c] new TLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] new TLDs, Andrew Lutts
  • RE: [wg-c] new TLDs, Roeland Meyer
  • [wg-c] The People's Choice of TLDs, Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] Contribution from denominated ICANN CTO, A.M. Rutkowski
  • [wg-c] A little less noise please (I'm trying to drink), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] fwd draft-hollenbeck-rrp-00.txt, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] I'm sure you all can guess ..., Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] current sld stats, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] The fruits of confessional conflict (Sunday after Solstice), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] wg-c tasks please, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] well, I'm back, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] more sld length stats, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] Chartered gTLD .RX or the like., Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] NSI's MILLENNIUM SPECIAL OFFER, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] year2000.com sold for $10 million, Attyross
  • [wg-c] Food for thought, Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] FW: Eeek - .NU Domains using Ö, Ä, Å, Ü, Ñ - And More, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] CNET.com - News - The Net - Teen Magazine clashes with porn site, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] Support for Position Paper A, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] AOL merges with Time Warner, Attyross
  • [wg-c] comment deadline for WG-C interim report, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] WG-C Position Paper Comments, Ross Wm. Rader
  • [wg-c] Comments, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Comments, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] non-member submission, forwarded for Michael Heltzer, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] comment summary, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] WIPO: Use of Trademarks on the Internet: Issues Paper, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Where we go from here, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Court rules that TLDs "could indeed" be protected speech, Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Keith Gymer
  • Posting to the list is enough! Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Keith Gymer
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Bret A. Fausett
  • RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Joseph Friedman
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Mark Measday
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Patrick Greenwell
  • RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Josh Elliott
  • Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Milton Mueller
  • RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU, Penman, Ian
  • [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs, Jay Parker
  • Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs, Harold Feld
  • Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs, Kent Crispin
  • RE: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] The moment of history, Harold Feld
  • Re: [wg-c] The moment of history, A.M. Rutkowski
  • [wg-c] The moment of distraction, Dave Crocker
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs, Dave Crocker
  • [wg-c] forwarded for Jay Parker, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Adding EU, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] Enouth NSI/IANA/ICANN Control, Robert Waters
  • Re: [wg-c] Enouth NSI/IANA/ICANN Control - Free, Robert Waters
  • [wg-c] The moment of distraction, Dave Crocker
  • [wg-c] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] STRAW POLL, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Straw poll response, Milton Mueller
  • [Fwd: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU], Mark Measday
  • [wg-c] where we go from here, redux, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] nine principles for domain names, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] nine principles for domain names, Karl Auerbach
  • [wg-c] Sheppard/Kleiman in WG-B, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] test, Elisabeth Porteneuve
  • [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Bret A. Fausett
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Bret A. Fausett
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Karl Auerbach
  • RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Winer, Jonathan
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Winer, Jonathan
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Milton Mueller
  • RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Paul Stahura
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] test delete, Joseph Friedman
  • [wg-c] Cairo meeting?, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Cairo meeting?, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Cairo meeting?, Mark C. Langston
  • [wg-c] Questions, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] reposted for Tim Vienneau, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [Fwd: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names: sense and sensibility?], Mark Measday
  • Re: Meaningful names and IP addresses (Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names), Philip Sheppard
  • [wg-c] Suggested gTLD, Anders Berg-Hansen
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names v5, Philip Sheppard
  • [wg-c] Reply to straw poll, dwmaher
  • [wg-c] A brief note on linguists..., Mark C. Langston
  • [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nine principles fordomain names], Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] Cairo meeting, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Request .eur or .euro, Edler & Nebel Softwareentwicklung
  • Re: [wg-c] Our mission, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nineprinciplesfor domain names], Kevin J. Connolly
  • RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re:nineprinciplesfor domain names], Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] forwarded for Eric Menge, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] straw poll update, possible consensus calls, and our mission, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] FW: Infosecurity @ White House, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] WGC Position Paper, Paul Stahura
  • [wg-c] straw poll vote, katie
  • Re: [wg-c] Some reactions to the principles v5, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v6, Philip Sheppard
  • (fwd) Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL VOTE, Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] straw poll results, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Comments on the 8 principles, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v7, Philip Sheppard
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v7, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v7, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v8, Philip Sheppard
  • [wg-c] .eu, Edler & Nebel Softwareentwicklung
  • [wg-c] WG-B, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] Status of WG-C: Cairo Presentation, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT, Jonathan Weinberg
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT, Josh Elliott
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT, Kendall Dawson
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT, Rothnie, Warwick
  • RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT, T Vienneau
  • [wg-c] FW: ADNS Press Release, Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • RE: [wg-c] FW: ADNS Press Release, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] reposted for Kendall Dawson, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] General Assembly Cairo Meeting on 8 March 2000, agenda, DNSO Listadmin
  • [wg-c] Kendall Dawson's thoughts, protection of famous names and marks, Winer, Jonathan
  • [wg-c] DNSO Names Council Cairo Meeting on 8 March 2000 - agenda, DNSO Listadmin
  • [wg-c] forwarded for Kendall Dawson, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] CPT/EI letter on TLDs, James Love
  • [wg-c] voting on TLDs, James Love
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Patrick Greenwell
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Patrick Greenwell
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Dave Crocker
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Dave Crocker
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Paul Garrin
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Kevin J. Connolly
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Winer, Jonathan
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Rothnie, Warwick
  • RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • [wg-c] non-consensus call, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout, Jonathan Weinberg
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout, Kendall Dawson
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout, T Vienneau
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout, Mark Measday
  • [wg-c] "process", Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] vote?, Justin McCarthy
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in theinitial rollout, Kevin J. Connolly
  • re: [wg-c] Re: vote?, Kendall Dawson
  • [wg-c] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKING GROUP C....", bob broxton
  • [wg-c] RE: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI, William X. Walsh
  • Message not available
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKING GROUP C....", Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE)OF WORKI, Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] NY Times Online 3/9, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] WG-C Report, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] No Specific Recs, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] forwarded for Mark Measday, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs ...), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "principles"), Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "principles"), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] WG-C List administrivia, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Paul Garrin
  • RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Kent Crispin
  • RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] "within the process", Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] "within the process", Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Paul Garrin
  • RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p, Paul Garrin
  • [wg-c] about the consensus call, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] convenience, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] WG-C List administrivia (revised), Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] INT domain, Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] Reposted for Roeland Meyer, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] The scope of gTLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] WG Report: deadlines and draft language, Jonathan Weinberg
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] WG Report: deadlines and draft language, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Deadlines and Draft Language, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] Restatement of wg-c discussion, Mark Measday
  • RE: [wg-c] about the consensus call; How do we get a degreeof, Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] Exclusions, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements, Josh Elliott
  • RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements, Dave Crocker
  • RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements, Josh Elliott
  • [wg-c] getting work done, versus not, Dave Crocker
  • RE: [wg-c] getting work done, versus not, Josh Elliott
  • Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements, Kent Crispin
  • RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements, Josh Elliott
  • RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] Exclusions, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Exclusions, Eric Brunner
  • RE: [wg-c] Exclusions, T Vienneau
  • RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements, T Vienneau
  • [wg-c] further exclusions/surity insterments, Rick H Wesson
  • No Subject, T Vienneau
  • [wg-c] Wesson draft - (gTLD Application Requirements), Kendall Dawson
  • [wg-c] current version of WG-C report, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Progress, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] reposted for Bret Fausett, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] WG-C report -- final version, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] OK, *really* final version, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] reposted for Bob Broxton, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Report, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] Silent and Reflective, Otherwise Active, or simply Dead or Zombie, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] terms of Registry license, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] whois - opperational issues && new gTLDs, Rick H Wesson
  • RE: [wg-c] Re: your mail, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Re: your mail, Eric Brunner
  • RE: [wg-c] Re: your mail, Winer, Jonathan
  • [wg-c] thanks for your work., Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • [wg-c] list etiquette, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report, BEARSEVEN
  • [wg-c] Vote on WG-C Report, Tony Linares
  • [wg-c] distributing gTLD whois, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • [wg-c] Shared TLD and shared roots?, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] Re: Shared TLD and shared roots?, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Ross Wm. Rader
  • RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Ross Wm. Rader
  • RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Karl Auerbach
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] more on non-shared gTLDs, Milton Mueller
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] reposted for Eric Brunner, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] FTC report on "lock-in", William X. Walsh
  • [wg-c] Vote, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] A plea, Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] The IAB statement on sharing DNS domain registires, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] The IAB statement on sharing DNS domain registires, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • [wg-c] Vote on WG report, Joop Teernstra
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (revision 1), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] official vote, Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
  • [wg-c] voting, Siegfried Langenbach
  • [wg-c] Yes vote on report, Joseph Friedman
  • [wg-c] Vote on WG report (part one), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • [wg-c] wg-c vote, dwmaher
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (long form), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] re: Administrivia, Kendall Dawson
  • [wg-c] VOTE WGC REPORT, Chicoine, Caroline
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (@10pm EST), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] WG-C report -- final tally, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Registrant thresholds (was: more on non-shared gTLDs), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Ambler/Meuller/Walsh/Meyers on .NAA, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] IPv6, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • [wg-c] non-commercial TLDS, James Love
  • [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report, megacz
  • Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report, James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report, Paul Garrin
  • RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report, Andrew Dalgleish
  • [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Mark C. Langston
  • RE: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Bret A. Fausett
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Patrick Greenwell
  • RE: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Robert F. Connelly
  • RE: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Christopher Ambler
  • Message not available
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Mark C. Langston
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Eric Brunner
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed, Kevin J. Connolly
  • [wg-c] Texts of wg-c and wg-b reports., Robert F. Connelly
  • correction: Re: [wg-c] Texts of wg-c and wg-b reports., Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] re: Choosing the intial testbed, Kendall Dawson
  • Re: [wg-c] re: Choosing the intial testbed, James Love
  • [wg-c] Market Research and Public Awareness, Greg Schuckman
  • [wg-c] ICANN June meeting and new gTLDs, Rothnie, Warwick
  • [wg-c] list rules, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Re: [wg-c[ Choosing the intial testbed, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Funding for NGOs in Cairo (was: Chosing Initial Testbed), Harold Feld
  • [wg-c] Domain Names Want To Be Free, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • [wg-c] The Hooker Flap Redoux, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Application Requirements?, Kendall Dawson
  • [wg-c] Application Requirements, Kendall Dawson
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Mikki Barry
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Mikki Barry
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Rick H Wesson
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements, John Charles Broomfield
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] Application Requirements, Kendall Dawson
  • Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements, Attyross
  • [wg-c] pointer to Sheppard/Kleiman princilials, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] Re: [wg-b] Creation of Famous List, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] Re: Application Requirements, Attyross
  • [wg-c] Overlimits, Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • Re: [wg-c] Sheppard/Kleiman princilials, Philip Sheppard
  • [wg-c] hypothetical registry application, Richard
  • [wg-c] Working Group C agenda, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Working Group C agenda, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] deadlines, James Love
  • [wg-c] Proposal for new TLDs, James Love
  • [wg-c] flawed process or flawed principles, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] why not name.space style:, Jonathan E. Graehl
  • [wg-c] OFF TOPIC: Jamie Love on Microsoft settlement, Martin B. Schwimmer
  • [wg-c] RE: History & current events (RE: [ga] About GA membership again......), Roeland M. J. Meyer
  • Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not i n 10-23 report], Richard
  • Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not i n 10-23 report, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently], Richard
  • Re: [Re: [Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently]], Richard
  • RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda], Winer, Jonathan
  • RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda], Andrew Dalgleish
  • RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda], Jean-Michel Becar
  • RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda], Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • RE: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Joe Kelsey
  • RE: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Alex Kamantauskas
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Eric Brunner
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Simon Higgs
  • [wg-c] re: S/K principles, Kendall Dawson
  • [wg-c] Invitation for Public Comments on New gTLDs/Famous Trade-Marks, DNSO Listadmin
  • [wg-c] Guidelines for the initial rollout of new gTLDs, Kendall Dawson
  • [wg-c] S/K Principles, Justin McCarthy
  • [wg-c] Guidelines, Kendall Dawson
  • [wg-c] forwarded for Manon Ress, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Another gTLD starts up, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Ambler's take [was: Two Para etc, ], Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Moderate earthquake in Japan., Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] Re: [Nc-tlds] ICANN's Working Group C discussions on "Guidelines for the initialrollout of new gTLDs", Milton Mueller
  • [wg-c] deployment and implementation summary position paper D, Kent Crispin
  • [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, John Charles Broomfield
  • RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Simon Higgs
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Kent Crispin
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Craig Simon
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, James Love
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Christopher Ambler
  • RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • [wg-c] The Issues At Hand, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] RE: The Issues At Hand, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] The Issues At Hand, John Charles Broomfield
  • RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Alex Kamantauskas
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Bret A. Fausett
  • RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, William X. Walsh
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Paul Garrin
  • Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs, Paul Garrin
  • Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven, Dave Crocker
  • [wg-c] Mark's Proposal, Christopher Ambler
  • Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal, Simon Higgs
  • RE: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal, John Charles Broomfield
  • [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Dave Crocker
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, James Seng
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, John Charles Broomfield
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Bret A. Fausett
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Dongman Lee
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Karl Auerbach
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, William X. Walsh
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Jerry Yap
  • [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Joe Kelsey
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Alex Kamantauskas
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Josh Elliott
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Keith Gymer
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Patrick Greenwell
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Kilnam Chon
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Craig Simon
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Greg Schuckman
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Joop Teernstra
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Annie Renard
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, david
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Robert F. Connelly
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Rick H Wesson
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Raul Echeberria
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Ann-Catherine Andersson
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, YJ Park
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Paul Stahura
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Kevin J. Connolly
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Justin McCarthy
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Philip Sheppard
  • Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More), Bret A. Fausett
  • Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More), Simon Higgs
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Jean-Michel Becar
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, T Vienneau
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Penman, Ian
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, katie
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Kit Winter
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Kroon, Richard
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Andrew Dalgleish
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, J. William Semich
  • Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Elisabeth Porteneuve
  • [wg-c] re: CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT, Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
  • [wg-c] "It Won't Work", Dave Crocker
  • Re: [[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT], Richard Campbell
  • [wg-c] Convenience II, Justin McCarthy
  • Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2", Philip Sheppard
  • [wg-c] I agree with Shuckman, Timothy Denton
  • [wg-c] I-D ACTION:draft-iab-i18n-dns-00.txt (fwd), Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] wg-c list management, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Reminder, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (041400.1), Eric Brunner
  • RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (041500), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] TUCOWS.com Comments on IPC Sunrise Proposal, Ross Wm. Rader
  • [wg-c] Time to comment on IPC sunrise proposal, James Love
  • [wg-c] Re: [wg-b] Revised IPC Proposal, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] reposted for Hal Lubsen, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Administrivia (041700), Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] Wampumpeag.org Comments on WG-B Work Product, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] more list adminstration, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] 1447PDT 4/18, DNSO NC made all our work irrelevant, Mark C. Langston
  • [wg-c] nsi proposes to create new gTLds, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] That was fun, Christopher Ambler
  • [wg-c] NC Statement on new gTLDs, Jonathan Weinberg
  • Re: [Re: [wg-c] nsi proposes to create new gTLds], Richard Campbell
  • [wg-c] Adios, Tony Linares
  • [wg-c] Respecting the process, Milton Mueller
  • Re: [wg-c] Respecting the process, Elisabeth Porteneuve
  • Re: [wg-c] Respecting the process, Philip Sheppard
  • [wg-c] Give NSI .shop and take back .com, James Love
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • Re: [wg-c] Give NSI .shop and take back .com, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] DNSO Names Council Statement on new gTLDs, DNSO Listadmin
  • [wg-c] Call for comments on WG-B formal report, ending 10 May 2000, DNSO Listadmin
  • [wg-c] Tuesday's NC meeting, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] NSI's "survey" shows most don't want 6 to 10 new TLDs, James Love
  • [wg-c] FYI: Slashdot, Simon Higgs
  • [wg-c] for the NC, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Re: for the NC, Elisabeth Porteneuve
  • [wg-c] disbanding, Rick H Wesson
  • [wg-c] Sunday Reflections, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] FYI - CNN article that mentions WG-C, Alex Kamantauskas
  • Re: [wg-c] WG C, Philip Sheppard
  • [wg-c] Yokohama DNSO agenda, DNSO Listadmin
  • [wg-c] Number of participants in the DNSO mailing lists over time, DNSO Secretariat
  • [wg-c] RE: Sunset for sunrise, Roeland Meyer \(E-mail\)
  • [wg-c] Subscriptions to the DNSO General Assembly voting registry, DNSO Secretariat
  • [wg-c] All you need to know about life;-}, Robert F. Connelly
  • [wg-c] FW: [ga] court curbs icann, Roeland Meyer \(E-mail\)
  • [wg-c] Formalizing Voting Procedures for the DNSO GA, DNSO Secretariat
  • [wg-c] ICANN - New TLD Consultation document, DNSO Secretariat
  • [wg-c] Call for comments on WG-E final report, DNSO Secretariat
  • [wg-c] Re: [council] Draft final report of WG-E Global Awareness and Outreach for pu..., YJ Park
  • [wg-c] Re: [council] Draft final report of WG-E Global Awareness and Outreach, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] 50 grand to enter the pagent, Eric Brunner
  • [wg-c] RE: Give me a plan., Roeland M.J. Meyer
  • [wg-c] Call for Nominations for the election of ICANN Board member, DNSO Secretariat
  • [wg-c] firms that provide services for new TLDs, James Love
  • [wg-c] How's this for spamming by a RegistraR?, Robert F. Connelly
  • <Possible follow-up(s)>
  • [wg-c] How's this for spamming by a RegistraR?, Robert F. Connelly
  • RE: [wg-c] How's this for spamming by a RegistraR?, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
  • RE: [wg-c] telephone numbers in domain names., Jean-Michel Becar
  • [wg-c] three bounced messages, Jonathan Weinberg
  • [wg-c] Agenda suggestions for the next NC teleconferences, DNSO Secretariat
  • [wg-c] forwarded for Judith Oppenheimer, Jonathan Weinberg
    • Mail converted by MHonArc 2.3.3