[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs

To: James Love <love@cptech.org>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:22:37 -0800
Cc: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>, wg-c <wg-c@dnso.org>
In-Reply-To: <38CD31F5.997ED039@cptech.org>
References: <38C300A7.70ACEB2@cptech.org><20000305141438.A23254@songbird.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 10:22 AM 3/13/00 -0800, James Love wrote:
>Kent Crispin wrote:
> > Suppose 10000 new members suddenly appeared and decided to add a TLD
> > called ".general-motors".  Or maybe ".saddam".  And then 30000 more
> > people suddenly joined and voted for ".death-to-gore".
>
>     Are there technical reasons why these TLDs should not be approved?

Is there any reason you focus only on "technical"?

And since this discussion comprises such a wide range of participant 
skills, please clarify what you consider the term "technical" to cover.

d/


=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA

References:
- [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
- Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
  - From: James Love <love@cptech.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
Next by Date: RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread