Historical Resolution Tracking Feature » 2012-05-06 - Ratification of Global Policy Proposal From ASO for Post Exhaustion IPV4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA Function

Important note: The explanatory text provided through this database (including the summary, implementation actions, identification of related resolutions, and additional information) is an interpretation or an explanation that has no official authority and does not represent the purpose behind the Board actions, nor does any explanations or interpretations modify or override the Resolutions themselves. Resolutions can only be modified through further act of the ICANN Board.

2012-05-06 - Ratification of Global Policy Proposal From ASO for Post Exhaustion IPV4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA Function


Resolution of the ICANN Board
Topic: 
Ratification of Global Policy Proposal From ASO for Post Exhaustion IPV4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA Function
Summary: 

Ratification of Global Policy Proposal From ASO for Post Exhaustion IPV4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA Function

Category: 
Internet Protocols
Meeting Date: 
Sun, 6 May 2012
Resolution Number: 
2012.05.06.01
Status: 
Complete
Implementation Actions: 
ICANN on 16th November 2013 wrote to the ASO Address Council seeking guidance on the interpretation of the Global Policy for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA, which was ratified in May 2012. This was in line with the ASO Address Council’s responsibility of "providing advice to the Board of ICANN on number resource allocation policy, in conjunction with the Regional Internet Registries," laid out in the ICANN/ASO MoU. The request specifically stated that according to the Global Policy, "Allocations from the IANA may begin once the pool is declared active." It is not clear whether this means that allocation from the Recovered IPv4 Pool should be made straight away or whether they should happen at the start of the next "IPv4 allocation period," the "6-month period following 1 March or 1 September." The ASO Address Council provided a formal response to the request for guidance from the ASO Address Council to ICANN on 14 April 2014, which was as follows: Advice: After consultations with the Internet number communities through the respective RIRs, the ASO Address Council has drawn rough community consensus and advises IANA to implement the Global Policy for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA as follows: 1. Make the first allocation from the IANA recovered pool immediately after the pool is declared active. This first allocation should also be consistent with the rest of the policy. 2. Make all subsequent allocations consistent with the IPv4 allocation period specified in the policy text.
Resolution Text: 

Whereas, the last five unicast IPv4 /8s were allocated to the five RIRs in accordance with Global Policy on 3 February 2011.

Whereas, there is currently no policy mechanism for redistributingIPv4 address space between RIRs.

Whereas, the addressing community has developed and reached consensus on a policy proposal allowing returned IPv4 address space to be shared equally between all five RIR regions.

Whereas, the Board on 21 April 2011 resolved to request ICANN staff to track the development of this policy proposal in background reports and such reports have been submitted regularly.

Whereas, on 13 March 2012, the ASO Address Council submitted the policy proposal to ICANN Board for ratification.

Whereas, the proposal was published for public comments from 14 March 2012 until 4 April 2012, during which time no comments were submitted.

Resolved (2012.05.06.01), that the Global Policy for Post Exhaustion IPv4 Allocation Mechanisms by the IANA is ratified in line with clause 9 of Attachment A to the 2004 ASO MoU.

Rationale for Resolution: 

The proposed action is intended to ratify a policy proposal that has achieved consensus in all five addressing communities and to enable implementation of the policy by ICANN in performing the IANA functions. The action to be taken does not entail any budgetary consequences in and of itself, nor any potential negative effects. It is important to take this action now to respect the 60-day window for Board decision stipulated in the ASO MoU.

Additional Information: